Key result
Telemedicine reduced the incidence of acute non-fatal heart failure events compared to usual care.
Why the study?
Does a telemedicine intervention reduce acute non-fatal heart failure events in patients with chronic heart failure and LVEF ≥40%?
RCT (n=116)
randomized
No
Does a telemedicine intervention reduce acute non-fatal heart failure events in patients with chronic heart failure and LVEF ≥40%?
Telemedicine added to a multidisciplinary care program significantly reduces acute heart failure events and healthcare costs in patients with HF and LVEF ≥40%.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports telemedicine adoption in HFpEF/HFmrEF to cut events; extends RCT evidence to this population.
Background: The efficacy of telemedicine in the management of patients with chronic heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40% is poorly understood. The aim of our analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of a telemedicine-based intervention specifically in these patients, as compared to standard of care alone. Methods: The Insuficiència Cardiaca Optimització Remota (iCOR) study was a single centre, randomised, controlled trial, designed to evaluate a telemedicine intervention added to an existing hospital/primary care multidisciplinary, integrated programme for chronic heart failure patients. 178 participants were randomised to telemedicine or usual care, and were followed for six months. For the present sub-analysis, only iCOR participants (n = 116) with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40% were included. The primary study endpoint was the incidence of an acute non-fatal heart failure event, defined as a new episode of worsening of symptoms and signs consistent with acute heart failure requiring intravenous diuretic therapy. The healthcare-related costs in each study group were also evaluated. Results: The incidence of the first occurrence of the primary endpoint was significantly lower in the telemedicine arm (22% vs 56%, p<0.001), with a hazard ratio of 0.33 comparing to the usual care arm (95% confidence interval 0.17–0.64). Telemedicine was also associated with lower mean overall chronic heart failure care-related costs compared to usual care (8163€ vs 4993€, p=0.001). The results were consistent in both left ventricular ejection fraction of 40–49% and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% patients. Conclusions: Our results suggest that telemedicine is a promising strategy for the management of chronic heart failure patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%. These findings should be replicated in larger cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiménez‐Marrero et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in chronic heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40% (n=116). Telemedicine vs. Usual care was evaluated on incidence of an acute non-fatal heart failure event (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.17-0.64, p=<0.001). Telemedicine reduced the incidence of acute non-fatal heart failure events compared to usual care.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: