Key result
Direct transport of STEMI patients to a PCI center versus transfer from a non-PCI center was associated with shorter times to reperfusion.
Why the study?
Does direct transport to a PCI-capable hospital reduce time to reperfusion in patients with STEMI?
Cohort (n=1,288)
Yes
Does direct transport to a PCI-capable hospital reduce time to reperfusion in patients with STEMI?
A statewide pre-hospital strategy to bypass non-PCI hospitals for direct transport to PCI centers significantly improves adherence to guideline-recommended reperfusion times in STEMI patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Direct transport to PCI centers was associated with shorter STEMI reperfusion times; hypothesis-generating for statewide protocols, needing prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: The ultimate treatment goal for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is rapid reperfusion via primary percutaneous intervention (PCI). North Carolina has adopted a statewide STEMI referral strategy that advises paramedics to bypass local hospitals and transport STEMI patients directly to a PCI-capable hospital, even if a non-PCI-capable hospital is closer. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed the adherence of emergency medical services to this STEMI protocol, as well as subsequent associations with patient treatment times and outcomes by linking data from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry(®)-Get With the Guidelines(™) and a statewide emergency medical services data system from June 2008 to September 2010 for all patients with STEMI. Patients were divided into those (1) transported directly to a PCI hospital, thereby bypassing a closer non-PCI hospital and (2) first taken to a closer non-PCI center and later transferred to a PCI hospital. Among 6010 patients with STEMI, 1288 were eligible and included in our study cohort. Of these, 826 (64%) were transported directly to a PCI facility, whereas 462 (36%) were first taken to a non-PCI hospital and later transferred. In a multivariable model, increase in differential driving time and cardiac arrest were associated with a lesser likelihood of being taken directly to a PCI center, whereas a history of PCI was associated with a higher likelihood of being taken directly to a PCI center. Patients sent directly to a PCI center were more likely to have times between first medical contact and PCI within guideline recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients who were sent directly to a PCI center had significantly shorter time to reperfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fosbøl et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=1,288). Direct transport to a PCI-capable hospital vs. First taken to a closer non-PCI center and later transferred was evaluated on Time to reperfusion and time between first medical contact and PCI within guideline recommendations. Direct transport of STEMI patients to a PCI center versus transfer from a non-PCI center was associated with shorter times to reperfusion.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: