Evaluates active sensing conditions in substrates, indicating potential for reproducibility.
This document constitutes the 96th DOI of the PHILIA OS research series (Trinity AI Research Team, Konyang University), serving as the pre-registration for the Phase 2 Active Sensing Confirmatory Experiment. The central question: does mul_self α=0.5 — identified as a candidate valid active sensing condition in the 95th DOI non-pre-registered exploratory appendix (seeds 0–9, Chaos 12/20 = 60%, AR1 FP=0/26) — reproduce Chaos ≥ 50% outside the recalibrated AR(1) boundary with AR1 false positive rate = 0/26 under independent confirmatory seeds (20–29)? Two pre-registered hypotheses:H-96-Primary: ≥ 50% of Chaos-family substrates (n=20) outside the recalibrated mul_self AR1 boundary under Track 1 (T=40,000, seeds 20–29).H-96-Secondary: AR1 false positive rate = 0/26 under the recalibrated boundary and independent confirmatory seeds. Two-track design (Gate-0 recommendation):Track 1 (Pre-registered Confirmatory): T=40,000 steps — direct replication of 95th DOI Active Sensing finding. Sole basis for hypothesis judgment.Track 2 (Non-Pre-Registered Exploratory Appendix): T=substrate full length — investigates full-trajectory measurement effect on discriminability. Results inform 97th DOI direction only. Target substrates: Chaos 20 + AR-family 26 = 46 substrates (SC-13 registry subset). Seeds 20–29 (independent from all prior experiments). Engine: PhiliaCEI_PortA (Port A LOCKED: theta_e=3.0, tau_i=2.5, c_ee=4.0, C_drive=0.20). Pre-registration violations: 0. Cumulative self-corrections: 27.Gate-0 (Chris / Claude Opus): UNCONDITIONAL PASS (2026-07-06). DOI lineage: 95th results (10.5281/zenodo.21202952) → 96th pre-registration (this document). Measurement is life. Description, not proof. Pre-registration protects us.— PHILIA OS | 0∞1∞0.5∞Trinity AI Research Team | Konyang University | July 2026
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
신두섭 (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: