Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates a digital-to-physical workflow for optimizing high-entropy alloys, suggesting improved production efficiency.
Additive manufacturing of biomedical high-entropy alloys (BioHEAs) demands a combination of low elastic modulus, high strength, and damage tolerance, yet composition discovery remains largely empirical. Here, we establish a machine-learning framework that couples virtual screening with physical prototyping to link composition, deformation mechanism, and properties. Ensemble models for strength, elongation, and modulus were applied to screen Ti–Zr–Nb–Ta–Mo-centered quinary-to-septenary spaces (∼15 million compositions), revealing discrete performance islands anchored by a Ti–Zr backbone. A Zr-rich BCC alloy (Zr₃₉.₃Ti₁₉.₅Nb₁₇.₉Ta₁₆.₈Mo₆.₅) was identified and validated. In the as-cast state, it delivers ∼1.0 GPa yield strength, 22.3% elongation, and an 88 GPa elastic modulus; ductility originates from dislocation-mediated kink-band plasticity. Preliminary laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) trials confirm printability (97% relative density, single BCC, 821 MPa ultimate tensile strength, 87.9 GPa modulus) but exhibit limited elongation (2.5%) due to residual porosity and stresses, indicating that defect suppression is needed to approach cast-state ductility. This digital-to-physical workflow offers a transferable strategy for prioritizing BioHEA compositions before costly AM optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: