Randomized trial investigates hydrogenation impact on toughness in stainless steels, highlighting structural effects.
In the present work, four grades of austenitic stainless steels, namely AISI 321, AISI 316Ti, AISI 309, and AISI 310S, are investigated in terms of electrochemical hydrogenation effect on their room-temperature impact toughness. All the materials were studied in their as-received (AR), i.e., industrially manufactured, material condition. LOM and SEM microstructural analyses combined with phase XRD and EBSD phase analyses revealed in all steels the polygonal-grain austenitic matrix and varying minor amounts of elongated δ-ferrite grains. Moreover, the metastable AISI 321 and AISI 316Ti steels exhibited noticeable occurrence (16% and 10%, respectively) of the BCC-structured phases (i.e., the strain-induced α′-martensite and non-equilibrium δ-ferrite) and little occurrence of primary TiN nitrides (below 1%). The AISI 321 and AISI 316Ti steels exhibited average amounts of 2.95% and 6.32% of δ-ferrite, respectively. The stable AISI 309 steel exhibited the occurrence of intergranular (Cr,Fe)23(C,N)6 precipitates (below 3%), indicative of prolonged (slow) cooling from the warm working temperature during the material manufacturing. The individual steel grades exhibited variable values of hardness and impact toughness depending strongly on their solid solution alloying and the amounts of individual minor phases in their microstructures. The AISI 316Ti steel exhibited the highest average hardness (273 HV) and lowest impact toughness (160 J/cm2) due to Mo-alloying and having the highest amount of δ-ferrite. The AISI 310S steel showed the highest impact toughness (210 J/cm2) and the second highest hardness (245 HV) thanks to having the most stable austenitic microstructure with the highest Ni- and Cr-alloying. The AISI 321 and AISI 309 steels show similarly low hardness (195 HV vs. 196 HV) and medium values of impact toughness (202 J/cm2 vs. 193 J/cm2). More importantly, all the steels under investigation exhibited detectable hydrogen-induced toughening effects, indicated by the negative HEI values. The metastable steels showed the lowest toughening effects (HEI: −2.0% and −3.8% for AISI 321 and AISI 316Ti, respectively), likely due to the adverse effect of α′-martensite. In contrast, the stable steels exhibited much higher toughening (HEI: −5.2% and −7.6% for AISI 309 and AISI 310S, respectively). Microstructural observations indicated that such toughening behavior might be related to the hydrogen-enhanced deformation banding and hydrogen-enhanced deformation twinning mechanisms, dividing the grains into smaller deformation zones, increasing the overall dissipation of deformation energy and consequently the materials’ impact toughness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Falat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: