Key result
Additional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms after APVI fails to improve sinus rhythm.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether adding ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) after antral pulmonary vein isolation (APVI) improves clinical outcomes in patients with long-lasting persistent AF.
RCT (n=119)
randomized
Absolute Event Rate: 34% vs 36%
p-value: p=0.84
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) after antral pulmonary vein isolation (APVI) further improves the clinical outcome of APVI in patients with long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Ablation of CFAEs has been reported to eliminate persistent AF. However, residual pulmonary vein arrhythmogenicity is a common mechanism of recurrence. METHODS: In this randomized study, 119 consecutive patients (mean age 60 +/- 9 years) with long-lasting persistent AF underwent APVI with an irrigated-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter. Antral pulmonary vein isolation resulted in termination of AF in 19 of 119 patients (Group A, 16%). The remaining 100 patients who still were in AF were randomized to no further ablation and underwent cardioversion (Group B, n = 50) or to ablation of CFAEs in the left atrium or coronary sinus for up to 2 additional hours of procedure duration (Group C, n = 50). RESULTS: Atrial fibrillation terminated during ablation of CFAEs in 9 of 50 patients (18%) in Group C. At 10 +/- 3 months after a single ablation procedure, 18 of 50 (36%) in Group B and 17 of 50 (34%) in Group C were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs (p = 0.84). In Group A, 15 of 19 patients (79%) were in sinus rhythm. A repeat ablation procedure was performed in 34 of 100 randomized patients (for AF in 30 and atrial flutter in 4). At 9 +/- 4 months after the final procedure, 34 of 50 (68%) in Group B and 30 of 50 (60%) in Group C were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs (p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Up to 2 h of additional ablation of CFAEs after APVI does not appear to improve clinical outcomes in patients with long-lasting persistent AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oral et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation (n=119). Ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) vs. No further ablation and cardioversion was evaluated on Sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs at 10 +/- 3 months after a single ablation procedure (p=0.84). Ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms after APVI did not improve sinus rhythm rates at 10 months compared to no further ablation (34% vs 36%; p=0.84).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: