Key result
Increased left ventricular mass index altered the relationship between left ventricular filling pressure and E/e', with E/e' correlating with filling pressure only in patients with normal LVMI.
Why the study?
Does left ventricular mass index influence the correlation between E/e' and invasive left ventricular filling pressure in patients referred for cardiac catheterization?
Cross-Sectional (n=69)
Yes
Does left ventricular mass index influence the correlation between E/e' and invasive left ventricular filling pressure in patients referred for cardiac catheterization?
Left ventricular mass index significantly alters the reliability of E/e' as an estimator of left ventricular filling pressure, being accurate only in patients with normal LV mass.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multiple factors influence e' and E/e'; leaves open their reliability as LV relaxation and filling pressure indexes.
BACKGROUND: Early-diastolic mitral annular velocity (e') and the ratio of early-diastolic left ventricular (LV) inflow velocity (E) to e' (E/e') have been widely used as indexes of LV relaxation and filling pressure, respectively. However, many recent studies have demonstrated that they are not reliable in various clinical settings. We thus investigated the factors influencing these echocardiographic parameters in a multicenter study. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study group comprised 69 patients, referred for cardiac catheterization, and enrolled in 5 university hospitals. Time constant (τ) and LV mean diastolic pressure (LVMDP) were measured using a micromanometer-tipped catheter. Although e' only weakly correlated with τ (r=-0.35, P<0.01), E/e' modestly correlated with LVMDP (r=0.48, P<0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that hypertension (β=-0.33, P<0.01) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (β=0.44, P<0.001) were the independent determinants of e', and LV mass index (LVMI) (β=0.37, P<0.001) and LVMDP (β=0.47, P<0.001) were those of E/e'. Additionally, E/e' significantly correlated with LVMDP in patients with normal LVMI (r=0.74, P<0.001) but not in those with increased LVMI. CONCLUSIONS: The coincidence of hypertension and LVEF affected the relationship between LV relaxation and e', whereas LVMI altered the relationship between LV filling pressure and E/e'. Thus, clinical conditions associated with an increase in LVMI, such as LV hypertrophy and LV dilatation, should be considered when estimating the filling pressure from E/e'.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakabachi et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Patients referred for diagnostic cardiac catheterization (n=69). Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) vs. Normal LVMI was evaluated on Independent determinants of E/e' (ratio of early-diastolic LV inflow velocity to mitral annular velocity) (β=0.37, p=<0.001). Increased left ventricular mass index altered the relationship between left ventricular filling pressure and E/e', with E/e' correlating with filling pressure only in patients with normal LVMI.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: