Key result
Even in the presence of a high E/E' ratio, a low E/A ratio indicated lower left ventricular filling pressure and controlled fluid retention compared to a high E/A ratio.
Why the study?
Does the combined assessment of E/E' and E/A ratios improve the interpretation of left ventricular filling pressure?
Observational (n=1,266)
No
Does the combined assessment of E/E' and E/A ratios improve the interpretation of left ventricular filling pressure?
Even with a high E/E' ratio, a low E/A ratio indicates lower left ventricular filling pressure and controlled fluid retention, highlighting the value of combined echocardiographic assessment.
Combined E/E' and E/A ratios may aid diastolic assessment; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: High mitral inflow early (E) velocity to tissue Doppler E' ratio (E/E') and an E to late diastolic filling velocity ratio (E/A) are used to evaluate left ventricular (LV) diastolic function and filling pressure, but the usefulness of combined assessment of E/E' and E/A is not fully understood. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,266 patients who underwent echocardiography to assess cardiac function. Patients were grouped based on the values of E/E' (low E/E'<15, high E/E'≥15) and E/A (low E/A≤0.8, high E/A>0.8). Results: High E/E' with both high and low E/A groups showed lower LV ejection fraction and higher LV mass index compared to low E/E' with both high and low E/A groups. High E/E' with both high and low E/A groups showed slower E' velocity and larger left atrial volume index compared to low E/E' with both high and low E/A groups, but high E/E' with low E/A group exhibited smaller left atrial volume index and higher pulmonary venous systolic to diastolic peak velocity ratio compared to high E/E' with high E/A group. Moreover, high E/E' with low E/A group displayed lower tricuspid regurgitant pressure gradient than the high E/E' with high E/A group. Conclusion: Even in the situation of high E/E', low E/A condition indicated lower LV filling pressure and controlled fluid retention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oikawa et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Cardiac function assessment (n=1,266). High E/E' ratio with low E/A ratio vs. High E/E' ratio with high E/A ratio was evaluated on Left ventricular filling pressure and fluid retention parameters (left atrial volume index, S/D ratio, tricuspid regurgitant pressure gradient). Even in the presence of a high E/E' ratio, a low E/A ratio indicated lower left ventricular filling pressure and controlled fluid retention compared to a high E/A ratio.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: