Key result
Hemodialysis decreased flow propagation velocity in patients with LVEF >50%, but not in those with LVEF <50%, indicating FPV is preload-dependent only when LVEF is preserved.
Why the study?
Does hemodialysis-induced preload reduction alter flow propagation velocity in uremic patients with varying left ventricular ejection fractions?
Observational (n=93)
Does hemodialysis-induced preload reduction alter flow propagation velocity in uremic patients with varying left ventricular ejection fractions?
Flow propagation velocity is preload-dependent in patients with preserved LVEF but preload-independent in those with reduced LVEF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Consider EF when interpreting FPV changes during hemodialysis; leaves open its role as a preload-independent diastolic marker.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the change in flow propagation velocity (FPV) in uremic patients who undergo regular hemodialysis (H/D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 93 uremic patients (44 men and 49 women; 59 +/- 14-years-old) receiving regular hemodialysis. Patients were separated by baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): 71 patients with LVEF > 50% (group 1), 13 patients with LVEF 35-50% (group 2), 7 patients with LVEF < 35% (group 3). All patients were in sinus rhythm before H/D. They received complete transthoracic echocardiographic examinations. Flow propagation velocity was measured by color M-mode echocardiography in apical four chambers view. All these parameters were obtained before and after H/D. Paired data were compared. According to different H/D amounts, we viewed the FPV response after H/D in variant baseline LVEF groups. RESULT: The baseline FPV became lower in patients with low LVEF. After H/D, obvious decrement of FPV occurred in group 1, but there were no obvious changes in groups 2 and 3. In fact, a slight increment of FPV was found in group 3. In patients with baseline LVEF > 50%, FPV after H/D was almost always lower, regardless of H/D amount. But there was different response in patients with baseline LVEF < 50%. CONCLUSION: Flow propagation velocity is preload independent in patients with LVEF < 50%, but it is preload-dependent in patients with LVEF > 50%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Uremia requiring regular hemodialysis (n=93). Hemodialysis vs. Baseline (before hemodialysis) was evaluated on Change in flow propagation velocity (FPV). Hemodialysis decreased flow propagation velocity in patients with LVEF >50%, but not in those with LVEF <50%, indicating FPV is preload-dependent only when LVEF is preserved.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: