Review evaluates the therapeutic role of bispecific antibodies in oncogene-driven NSCLC, suggesting potential benefits in combination therapies.
Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) have emerged as a novel therapeutic class in oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), designed to simultaneously target multiple signaling pathways and overcome resistance mechanisms associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Unlike small-molecule TKIs, bsAbs enable dual receptor blockade and immune effector engagement, offering a mechanistically distinct advantage in the context of tumor heterogeneity and bypass signaling. This review summarizes the structural and biological principles underlying bsAb design, with a focus on clinically approved agents such as amivantamab (EGFR/MET) and zenocutuzumab (HER2/HER3) and a growing pipeline of investigational agents. We evaluate key clinical evidence from Phase I-III trials including CHRYSALIS, PAPILLON, MARIPOSA, MARIPOSA-2 and eNRGy, and compare the efficacy, toxicity, and CNS penetration profile of bsAbs relative to TKIs and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs). While bsAbs demonstrate meaningful clinical activity, particularly in TKI-resistant disease and molecularly defined subsets such as EGFR exon 20 insertions and NRG1 fusions, their limitations, including intravenous administration, increased immune-mediated and thromboembolic toxicity, currently preclude replacement of TKIs in most settings. Collectively, available evidence supports a complementary role for bsAbs within evolving multimodal treatment paradigms, particularly in combination strategies. Future directions include biomarker-driven patient selection, improved drug engineering and integration into adaptive therapeutic sequencing frameworks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: