Key result
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are involved in provoking atherosclerotic plaque rupture, but clinical translation requires overcoming barriers like structural complexity and lack of adequate models.
Overcoming barriers to targeting individual matrix metalloproteinases could lead to new treatments for preventing atherosclerotic plaque rupture and myocardial infarction.
Barriers hinder MMP inhibitor translation for plaque stabilization; challenges clinical adoption while extending mechanistic research priorities.
Atherosclerotic plaque rupture provokes most myocardial infarctions. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have counteracting roles in intimal thickening, which stabilizes plaques, on the one hand and extracellular matrix destruction that leads to plaque rupture on the other. This review briefly summarizes the key points supporting the involvement of individual MMPs in provoking plaque rupture and discusses the barriers that stand in the way of clinical translation, which can be itemised as follows: structural and functional complexity of the MMP family; lack of adequate preclinical models partly owing to different expression patterns of MMPs and TIMPs in mouse and human macrophages; the need to target individual MMPs selectively; the difficulties in establishing causality in human studies; and the requirement for surrogate markers of efficacy. Overcoming these barriers would open the way to new treatments that could have a major impact on cardiovascular mortality worldwide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew C. Newby (2015) conducted a review in Atherosclerotic plaque rupture and myocardial infarction. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) was evaluated. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are involved in provoking atherosclerotic plaque rupture, but clinical translation requires overcoming barriers like structural complexity and lack of adequate models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: