Key result
Cardiac CT in aortic endocarditis shows ~23% lower visibility in mid coronary segments vs proximal.
Why the study?
Cardiac computed tomography is recommended as a complementary exam and for coronary evaluation in aortic valve infective endocarditis, but its coronary visualization performance and concordance with transoesophageal findings required evaluation.
Does cardiac computed tomography provide adequate visualization of coronary arteries and concordant diagnostic findings with transoesophageal echocardiography in patients with aortic valve infective endocarditis?
Cohort (n=39)
No
Does cardiac computed tomography provide adequate visualization of coronary arteries and concordant diagnostic findings with transoesophageal echocardiography in patients with aortic valve infective endocarditis?
Effect estimate: RD -0.23 (95% CI -0.32 to -0.14)
In patients with aortic valve infective endocarditis, CCT provides good visibility of proximal coronary arteries but suboptimal visibility of distal segments, and demonstrates low concordance with TOE for specific IE lesions, highlighting its role as a complementary rather than standalone diagnostic tool.
Background: Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) is recommended as a complementary exam and for coronary artery disease evaluation in patients with aortic valve IE (AVIE). We aimed to evaluate the performance of CCT in visualizing coronary arteries in patients with AVIE and its concordance with transoesophageal findings. Methods: We included patients admitted for AVIE who underwent CCT from 2016 to 2023. Coronary arteries were divided into 17 segments according to the American Heart Association and compared using generalized linear models extended to the binomial family. Results were presented as risk differences (RDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For those undergoing cardiac surgery, we evaluated the concordance among CCT, TOE, and surgical inspection using Cohen’s kappa (κ) test. Results: During the study period, 39 patients with AVIE performed CCT, of whom 28 underwent cardiac surgery. Visibility of coronary arteries was lower in median segments (RD −0.23; 95% CI −0.32 to −0.14) and in distal segments (RD −0.25; 95% CI −0.36 to −0.15) compared to proximal ones. Visibility of left anterior descending artery 2 was higher compared to right coronary artery 2 (RD 0.33; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.45) and obtuse marginal (RD 0.33; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.15). Concordance between CCT and TOE was globally low for vegetations (kappa 0.14), pseudoaneurysms (kappa 0.46), and paravalvular leakage (kappa 0.36). Conclusions: This study highlights the complementary role of CCT in diagnosing IE, given its low concordance with TOE for specific IE lesions. Furthermore, while CCT offers good visibility of the proximal coronary arteries in patients with AVIE, the visibility of the median and distal segments may be suboptimal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valsecchi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve infective endocarditis (n=39). Cardiac computed tomography vs. Transoesophageal echocardiography was evaluated on Visibility of coronary arteries in median segments compared to proximal segments (RD -0.23, 95% CI -0.32 to -0.14). Cardiac computed tomography in patients with aortic valve infective endocarditis provided lower visibility of median (RD -0.23) and distal (RD -0.25) coronary segments compared to proximal segments.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: