Key result
DAPT cuts new stroke ~33% vs aspirin alone only in patients without established cardiovascular disease.
Why the study?
Patients with established CVD may face a higher risk of recurrent stroke and higher antiplatelet resistance than those without CVD, leaving the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel plus aspirin in this population unclear.
Does dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin reduce the risk of new stroke compared to aspirin alone in patients with mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA and established cardiovascular disease?
RCT (n=6,100)
Double-blind
1:1 ratio
Yes
Does dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin reduce the risk of new stroke compared to aspirin alone in patients with mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA and established cardiovascular disease?
Hazard Ratio: 0.97 (95% CI 0.73–1.28)
Absolute Event Rate: 8.7% vs 8.8%
p-value: p=0.82
Patients with established cardiovascular disease may not derive additional benefit from dual antiplatelet therapy over aspirin alone for secondary stroke prevention within 90 days, but face higher bleeding risks.
Patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) may have a higher risk of recurrent stroke and a higher prevalence of antiplatelet resistance than those without CVD. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with clopidogrel plus aspirin in patients with established CVD. This is a secondary post hoc analysis of the Intensive Statin and Antiplatelet Therapy for Acute High-risk Intracranial or Extracranial Atherosclerosis (INSPIRES) trial. Patients with mild ischemic stroke (IS) or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) of presumed atherosclerotic cause were randomized to receive either DAPT or aspirin alone within 72 h after symptom onset. Established CVD was defined as a prior diagnosis of IS, coronary artery disease, TIA, or peripheral arterial disease. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the occurrence of new stroke and moderate-to-severe bleeding within 90 days. This study included 6100 patients, with a mean age of 63.7 ± 9.6 years and 35.8% of female. DAPT was associated with a reduced risk of new stroke (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67, 95%CI: 0.54-0.85, P < 0.001) in non-CVD patients but not in those with established CVD (HR = 0.97, 95%CI: 0.73-1.28, P = 0.82), compared with aspirin (P for interaction = 0.04). Moderate-to-severe bleeding did not differ by antiplatelet treatments across CVD subgroups (P for interaction = 0.32). In the INSPIRES trial, patients with established CVD may benefit less from clopidogrel-aspirin in reducing the risk of recurrent stroke within 90 days than those without CVD after mild IS or high-risk TIA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03635749.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Mild ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) (n=6,100). Clopidogrel plus aspirin (DAPT) vs. Aspirin alone (matching clopidogrel placebo for 90 days plus aspirin 100-300 mg on day 1 and 100 mg daily on days 2-90) was evaluated on Occurrence of new stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) within 90 days in patients with established CVD (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.28, p=0.82). Dual antiplatelet therapy reduced the risk of new stroke compared to aspirin alone in patients without cardiovascular disease (HR 0.67) but not in those with established cardiovascular disease (HR 0.97, p for interaction=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: