Experimental study investigates deflection and performance of UHPC-NC composite beams, suggesting design optimization.
Based on the excellent mechanical properties of UHPC such as high strength and good toughness, UHPC is used to replace part of NC in the mid-span of beams to form an UHPC-NC composite beam, a design that optimizes both the cost and mechanical properties of the composite beam. The effect of the ratio of UHPC length to calculated span ( L u / L ) on the performance of the composite beams in terms of crack load, peak load, mid-span deflection and stiffness was investigated by four-point flexural tests. The study shows that (1) the peak load of full UHPC beam (UB) is 40.2% higher than that of the NB beam, and peak loads of composite beams UN-HB1, UN-HB2 and UN-HB3 can reach 79.8%, 97.6% and 98.7% of the peak load of the UB beam, respectively. (2) Composite beams with larger L u / L have better deformation capacity, the ductility of UN-HB1 is 22.1% higher than that of NB. (3) The stiffnesses of composite beams UN-HB2 and UN-HB3 increased by 31.7% and 34.2% beam NB, and they were able to reach 83.2% and 84.3% of the stiffness of UB beam. (4) UHPC length ratio of 50% ( L u / L = 0.5) enables the composite beam to achieve satisfactory flexural performance. A calculation model is derived based on variable stiffness non-equal section beams and immediate stiffness, which can accurately predict the mid-span deflection of the composite beams.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: