Immunotherapy-Based Conversion to Curative-Intent Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multidisciplinary Framework

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations have become central systemic treatment options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and are now being integrated into selected intermediate-stage settings. As tumor responses have improved, some patients who were not initially candidates for curative-intent treatment may later become candidates for resection, ablation, or liver transplantation. However, radiographic response alone does not define curative-intent candidacy, and no shared framework currently guides how post-immunotherapy response should be translated into a treatment decision. Terminology also differs regionally: Asian literature frames a resection-anchored paradigm, whereas Western practice uses transplant-anchored downstaging. This narrative review proposes a multidisciplinary framework for immunotherapy-based conversion to curative-intent treatment in HCC. We first clarify the lexicon of conversion, downstaging, bridging, neoadjuvant therapy, post-ICI transplantation, and drug-free or treatment-free status. We then summarize conversion-relevant evidence across key clinical decision settings, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)-unsuitable intermediate-stage disease, portal vein tumor thrombus or macrovascular invasion, borderline-resectable or locally advanced disease, and transplant downstaging or bridging. The central framework defines curative-intent transition through the intersection of three domains: technical suitability, oncologic suitability, and physiologic or liver-reserve suitability. Biomarkers, imaging response, tumor-marker kinetics, liver function, and treatment-related toxicity are discussed as inputs into candidacy rather than as response measures alone. Finally, we propose a multidisciplinary workflow and highlight lessons from pancreatic cancer, biliary tract cancer, and colorectal liver metastases. As an expert-opinion-based framework, this approach should structure multidisciplinary discussion rather than serve as validated selection criteria; harmonized terminology, prospective conversion registries, and conversion-specific endpoints are needed for prospective validation.