Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 2, 2020European Journal of Heart FailureOpen Access

Interactions Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Sex and Effect of Neurohumoral Modulators in Heart Failure

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Treatment with neurohumoral modulators benefited women at higher LVEF than men, with women having mean LVEF 6.3%, 9.4%, and 10.3% higher than men across the respective trial pools.

Why the study?

To further investigate the relationship between sex, LVEF, and treatment response to neurohumoral modulators across the full range of HF phenotypes.

Does treatment with neurohumoral modulators (ARB, MRA, ARNI) have a differential effect based on sex and LVEF in patients with heart failure?

Comparison

Candesartan, MRAs, or sacubitril/valsartan vs trial control groups

Design

Pooled individual patient-level post hoc analysis of clinical trials

Authors

PDPooja DewanHeart Failure & TransplantAJAlice M. JacksonHeart Failure & Transplant
Carolyn S.P. Lam
Carolyn S.P. LamHeart Failure / Cardiomyopathy

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

May support higher LVEF thresholds for neurohumoral therapy benefit in women with HF; extends meta-analytic evidence on sex-specific responses.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=26,961)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does treatment with neurohumoral modulators (ARB, MRA, ARNI) have a differential effect based on sex and LVEF in patients with heart failure?

P
Population
26,961 patients with heart failure across the full range of LVEF, pooled from multiple clinical trials to assess sex and LVEF interactions with neurohumoral modulators.
I
Intervention
Neurohumoral modulators (candesartan, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, or sacubitril/valsartan)
C
Comparator
Control groups from the respective trials (placebo or active comparator)
O
Outcome
Composite of first occurrence of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular deathcomposite

Women with heart failure may derive clinical benefit from neurohumoral modulators at higher left ventricular ejection fractions than men, suggesting sex-specific LVEF thresholds for treatment efficacy.

Limitations

  • Post hoc analyses, only hypothesis generating
  • Interpretation of PARAGON-HF is more complex as it had an active comparator compared with a placebo control in the other trials
  • Post hoc analyses
  • Hypothesis generating
  • PARAGON-HF had an active comparator compared with a placebo control in the other trials

Cite This Study

Dewan et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (n=26,961). Neurohumoral modulators (ARB, MRA, or ARNI) vs. Placebo or active comparator was evaluated on First occurrence of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death. Treatment with neurohumoral modulators benefited women at higher LVEF than men, with women having mean LVEF 6.3%, 9.4%, and 10.3% higher than men across the respective trial pools.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a58dcd98bb2b43182001d75https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1776

Topics

HFrEF treatmentHeart failureHFpEF management
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Sex-Specific Cardiovascular Structure and Function in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction2014 · 244 citations
  2. 2Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction in CHARM: Characteristics, Outcomes and Effect of Candesartan Across the Entire Ejection Fraction Spectrum2018 · 432 citations
  3. 3Effects of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Women Compared With Men With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction2019 · 380 citations
  4. 4Angiotensin–Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction2019 · 2,431 citations
  5. 5Influence of ejection fraction on outcomes and efficacy of spironolactone in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction2015 · 534 citations