Key result
Treatment with neurohumoral modulators benefited women at higher LVEF than men, with women having mean LVEF 6.3%, 9.4%, and 10.3% higher than men across the respective trial pools.
Why the study?
To further investigate the relationship between sex, LVEF, and treatment response to neurohumoral modulators across the full range of HF phenotypes.
Does treatment with neurohumoral modulators (ARB, MRA, ARNI) have a differential effect based on sex and LVEF in patients with heart failure?
Comparison
Candesartan, MRAs, or sacubitril/valsartan vs trial control groups
Design
Pooled individual patient-level post hoc analysis of clinical trials
Authors
Loading...
May support higher LVEF thresholds for neurohumoral therapy benefit in women with HF; extends meta-analytic evidence on sex-specific responses.
Meta-Analysis (n=26,961)
Yes
Does treatment with neurohumoral modulators (ARB, MRA, ARNI) have a differential effect based on sex and LVEF in patients with heart failure?
Women with heart failure may derive clinical benefit from neurohumoral modulators at higher left ventricular ejection fractions than men, suggesting sex-specific LVEF thresholds for treatment efficacy.
Dewan et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (n=26,961). Neurohumoral modulators (ARB, MRA, or ARNI) vs. Placebo or active comparator was evaluated on First occurrence of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death. Treatment with neurohumoral modulators benefited women at higher LVEF than men, with women having mean LVEF 6.3%, 9.4%, and 10.3% higher than men across the respective trial pools.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: