Key result
SVEAT score outperforms HEART and TIMI for predicting 90-day major cardiovascular events with ~0.81 AUC.
Why the study?
In emergency department patients presenting with acute chest pain, early identification of those at risk for major adverse cardiac events remains a key challenge.
Does the SVEAT score improve the prediction of 90-day major adverse cardiac events in emergency department patients presenting with acute chest pain compared to the HEART and TIMI scores?
Cohort (n=348)
No
Does the SVEAT score improve the prediction of 90-day major adverse cardiac events in emergency department patients presenting with acute chest pain compared to the HEART and TIMI scores?
The SVEAT score demonstrated superior discriminative ability and higher specificity for predicting 90-day MACE in emergency department patients with acute chest pain compared to HEART and TIMI scores, though its low sensitivity limits its utility as a standalone rule-out tool.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SVEAT may support rule-in decisions for 90-day MACE in ED chest pain; leaves open whether it improves outcomes over HEART/TIMI in prospective studies.
In the emergency department, chest pain is a common presentation, and the primary clinical challenge is the early identification of patients at risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the SVEAT (Symptoms, Vascular Disease History, ECG, Age, and Troponin) score in predicting 90-day MACE in patients presenting with acute chest pain. This study included 348 patients presenting with acute chest pain. Serial high-sensitivity troponin I (HsTn-I) measurements were obtained at admission and 2 h later. Electrocardiographic and clinical data were recorded, and the SVEAT, HEART, and TIMI scores were calculated. Patients were followed for 90 days for MACE occurrence. MACE occurred in 7.2% of patients during the 90-day follow-up. The second high-sensitivity troponin I (HsTn-I) measurement was significantly associated with MACE ( p = 0.007). The SVEAT score demonstrated the highest discriminative performance (AUC = 0.806), compared with the HEART score (AUC = 0.756) and TIMI score (AUC = 0.753). At the optimal cut-off value of 4, the SVEAT score showed a sensitivity of 0.56 and a specificity of 0.86. In comparison, both the HEART and TIMI scores (cut-off = 3) showed higher sensitivity (0.72), with specificity values of 0.72 and 0.63, respectively. Not applicable. The SVEAT score may have potential as a rule-in tool for predicting 90-day MACE in emergency department patients presenting with acute chest pain, due to its higher specificity; however, this is accompanied by relatively low sensitivity, which limits its utility as a standalone screening tool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayvaz et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute chest pain (n=348). SVEAT score vs. HEART and TIMI scores was evaluated on 90-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (AUC 0.806, 95% CI 0.717-0.895, p=0.030). The SVEAT score demonstrated higher discriminative performance for predicting 90-day major cardiovascular events with an AUC of 0.806, outperforming the HEART and TIMI scores.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: