Key result
Dissection and re-entry techniques during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention were associated with a higher risk of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (RR 1.54) compared to wire escalation techniques.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the effect of dissection and re-entry versus wire escalation techniques on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with chronic total occlusion lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Do dissection and re-entry techniques improve long-term clinical outcomes compared to wire escalation techniques in patients with chronic total occlusion lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Meta-Analysis (n=5,265)
Do dissection and re-entry techniques improve long-term clinical outcomes compared to wire escalation techniques in patients with chronic total occlusion lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Extensive dissection and re-entry techniques for CTO PCI are associated with worse long-term clinical outcomes compared to wire escalation, whereas limited dissection and re-entry techniques appear comparable.
DR associated with higher long-term events in CTO PCI; leaves open whether technique selection independently affects outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of dissection and re-entry (DR) vs. wire escalation (WE) techniques on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: Studies were searched in electronic databases from inception to September, 2019. Results were pooled using random effects model and fixed effects model and are presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Pooled analyses revealed that patients with DR techniques had overall higher complexity CTO lesions than patients with WE techniques and required a greater number of stents and a greater mean stent length. The "extensive" DR techniques may have a higher incidence of target vessel revascularization (TVR) (RR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.77-2.98), in-stent restenosis (RR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.30-2.23), in-stent reocclusion (RR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.03-3.3) and death/myocardial infarction/TVR (RR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.71-2.58), when compared with WE techniques, during the long-term follow-up. However, "limited" DR techniques result in more promising outcomes, and are comparable to conventional WE techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Dissection and re-entry techniques were associated with increased risk of long-term negative clinical events, especially "extensive" DR techniques. However, "limited" DR techniques resulted in good long-term outcomes, comparable to WE techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis in Chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=5,265). Dissection and re-entry (DR) techniques vs. Wire escalation (WE) techniques was evaluated on Composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.27-1.87). Dissection and re-entry techniques during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention were associated with a higher risk of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (RR 1.54) compared to wire escalation techniques.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: