Key result
Coronary microembolization reduced infarct size compared to controls (18% vs 33%, P<0.05), but this delayed protection was abolished by TNF-alpha antibodies.
Why the study?
Does TNF-alpha mediate progressive contractile dysfunction and delayed protection against infarction following coronary microembolization in anesthetized pigs?
Does TNF-alpha mediate progressive contractile dysfunction and delayed protection against infarction following coronary microembolization in anesthetized pigs?
Absolute Event Rate: 18% vs 33%
p-value: p=<0.05
In a porcine model of coronary microembolization, TNF-alpha is responsible for both progressive contractile dysfunction and delayed protection against myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Implicates TNF-alpha in porcine microembolization effects; hypothesis-generating for human cardioprotection, requiring clinical validation.
Skyschally et al. (2006) studied Coronary microembolization (n=23). Coronary microembolization vs. Saline was evaluated on Infarct size (percentage area at risk) (p=<0.05). Coronary microembolization reduced infarct size compared to controls (18% vs 33%, P<0.05), but this delayed protection was abolished by TNF-alpha antibodies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: