Key result
An NT-proBNP cut-off of >5,180 ng/L independently predicted 12-month mortality (HR 2.19) in patients with acute decompensated heart failure, irrespective of residual renal function.
Why the study?
Does renal dysfunction influence the prognostic accuracy of NT-proBNP in predicting 12-month mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
Cohort (n=908)
Yes
Does renal dysfunction influence the prognostic accuracy of NT-proBNP in predicting 12-month mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 2.19 (95% CI 1.64–2.92)
Absolute Event Rate: 47.9% vs 15.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
NT-proBNP provides independent prognostic information for 12-month mortality in acute decompensated heart failure regardless of the patient's residual renal function.
Renal function may modify NT-proBNP prognostic utility in ADHF; leaves open whether eGFR-adjusted thresholds improve risk models.
BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction may confound the clinical interpretation of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration. This study investigated whether renal dysfunction influences the prognostic accuracy of NT-proBNP in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 908 ADHF patients. The primary outcome was 12-month mortality. Interaction between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and NT-proBNP in predicting mortality was tested with the likelihood ratio test. The patients were classified into 3 eGFR strata: ≥60, 30-59, and <30 ml·min(-1)·1.73 m(-2). Cox models were used to calculate the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for NT-proBNP, modeled as a dichotomous or categorized variable, within each level of eGFR. NT-proBNP was categorized using optimal cut-offs defined in ROC analysis for each eGFR level. A total of 234 patients (25.8%) died. Testing for interaction was not significant (χ(2)=0.29; P=0.5928). The adjusted HR for NT-proBNP >5,180 pg/ml was 2.09 (P<0.001) in the highest, 1.7 (P<0.001) in the intermediate, and 3.33 (P=0.010) in the lowest eGFR level. The adjusted HR for NT-proBNP above the optimal cut-offs defined on ROC analysis were 1.5 (P=0.239), 2.2 (P<0.001), and 3.24 (P=0.002), respectively. The models incorporating NT-proBNP as a dichotomous or categorized variable had equivalent C-statistics. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of interaction between eGFR and NT-proBNP in predicting mortality. The NT-proBNP cut-off of 5,180 ng/L provided independent prognostic information, irrespective of the level of residual renal function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scrutinio et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Acute decompensated heart failure (n=908). NT-proBNP >5,180 ng/L vs. NT-proBNP ≤5,180 ng/L was evaluated on 12-month all-cause mortality (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.64-2.92, p=<0.001). An NT-proBNP cut-off of >5,180 ng/L independently predicted 12-month mortality (HR 2.19) in patients with acute decompensated heart failure, irrespective of residual renal function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: