Key result
NT-proBNP and BNP testing in patients with kidney disease had similar diagnostic accuracy for decompensated heart failure, while NT-proBNP strongly predicted 1-year mortality (HR 4.5; 95% CI 2.0-10.2).
Why the study?
Does kidney disease affect the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of BNP and NT-proBNP for decompensated heart failure and 1-year mortality in dyspneic patients?
Cohort (n=831)
Does kidney disease affect the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of BNP and NT-proBNP for decompensated heart failure and 1-year mortality in dyspneic patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NT-proBNP and BNP are equally accurate for diagnosing decompensated heart failure in patients with kidney disease, but NT-proBNP is a superior independent predictor of 1-year mortality.
BACKGROUND: Concomitant occurrence of kidney disease (KD) and heart failure (HF) is common and associated with poor outcomes. Natriuretic peptide studies have typically excluded many individuals with KD. We compared the accuracy of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) for diagnosing decompensated HF and predicting mortality across the spectrum of renal function. METHODS: BNP and NT-proBNP were prospectively measured in a cohort of 831 dyspnea patients. KD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL . min(-1) . (1.73 m(2))(-1). The accuracy and predictive value of each test for diagnosing decompensated HF and predicting all-cause 1-year mortality were assessed by ROC area under the curve (AUC) and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 831 dyspnea patients, 393 (47%) had KD. The diagnostic accuracies of BNP and NT-proBNP in detecting decompensated HF were similar to each other in patients without KD (AUC 0.75 vs 0.74, respectively; P = 0.60) and in patients with KD (AUC 0.68 vs 0.66; P = 0.10). One-year mortality rates were 36.3% and 19.0% in those with and without KD, respectively (P <0.001). Progressively higher BNP and NT-proBNP concentrations remained predictive of increased mortality in KD patients. Compared with the lowest quartile, quartile 4 of BNP had an adjusted hazards ratio (HR) of 2.6 (95% CI 1.4-4.8; P = 0.004 for trend) and NT-proBNP quartile 4 had an HR of 4.5 (95% CI 2.0-10.2; P <0.001 for trend). Only NT-proBNP remained a predictor of death after adjustment for clinical confounders and the other natriuretic peptide marker. CONCLUSIONS: NT-proBNP and BNP are equivalent predictors of decompensated HF across a spectrum of renal function, but NT-proBNP is a superior predictor of mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
deFilippi et al. (2007) conducted a cohort in Dyspnea and suspected decompensated heart failure (n=831). NT-proBNP concentration (quartile 4) vs. Lowest quartile was evaluated on All-cause 1-year mortality (HR 4.5, 95% CI 2.0-10.2, p=<0.001 for trend). NT-proBNP and BNP testing in patients with kidney disease had similar diagnostic accuracy for decompensated heart failure, while NT-proBNP strongly predicted 1-year mortality (HR 4.5; 95% CI 2.0-10.2).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: