Key result
Established risk factors explained most racial differences in cardiovascular mortality, though after adjustment Native Hawaiian men still had a 69% excess risk of other heart disease compared to Whites.
Why the study?
Do established risk factors explain racial and ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease mortality among men and women?
Cohort (n=139,406)
Yes
Do established risk factors explain racial and ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease mortality among men and women?
Established cardiovascular risk factors explain the majority of racial and ethnic differences in AMI and OHD mortality, though some unexplained excess and deficit risks remain in specific populations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Risk factor adjustment may narrow observed racial disparities in CVD mortality; leaves open residual roles of unmeasured factors in specific groups.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality varies across racial and ethnic groups in the U.S., and the extent that known risk factors can explain the differences has not been extensively explored. METHODS: We examined the risk of dying from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and other heart disease (OHD) among 139,406 African-American (AA), Native Hawaiian (NH), Japanese-American (JA), Latino and White men and women initially free from cardiovascular disease followed prospectively between 1993-1996 and 2003 in the Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC). During this period, 946 deaths from AMI and 2,323 deaths from OHD were observed. Relative risks of AMI and OHD mortality were calculated accounting for established CVD risk factors: body mass index (BMI), hypertension, diabetes, smoking, alcohol consumption, amount of vigorous physical activity, educational level, diet and, for women, type and age at menopause and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use. RESULTS: Established CVD risk factors explained much of the observed racial and ethnic differences in risk of AMI and OHD mortality. After adjustment, NH men and women had greater risks of OHD than Whites (69% excess, P<0.001 and 62% excess, P = 0.003, respectively), and AA women had greater risks of AMI (48% excess, P = 0.01) and OHD (35% excess, P = 0.007). JA men had lower risks of AMI (51% deficit, P<0.001) and OHD (27% deficit, P = 0.001), as did JA women (AMI, 37% deficit, P = 0.03; OHD, 40% deficit, P = 0.001). Latinos had underlying lower risk of AMI death (26% deficit in men and 35% in women, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Known risk factors explain the majority of racial and ethnic differences in mortality due to AMI and OHD. The unexplained excess in NH and AA and the deficits in JA suggest the presence of unmeasured determinants for cardiovascular mortality that are distributed unequally across these populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henderson et al. (2007) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease mortality (n=139,406). Race/ethnicity and established cardiovascular risk factors vs. White participants was evaluated on Mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and other heart disease (OHD). Established risk factors explained most racial differences in cardiovascular mortality, though after adjustment Native Hawaiian men still had a 69% excess risk of other heart disease compared to Whites.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: