Key result
Long stenting (>40 mm) was significantly associated with a higher risk of target lesion failure compared to short stenting (HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.67-2.13; p<0.001).
Why the study?
The association between stent length and clinical outcomes after PCI using newer-generation DES needed to be understood.
Does long stenting (>40 mm) increase the risk of target lesion failure and stent thrombosis compared to short stenting (≤40 mm) in patients undergoing PCI with newer-generation DES?
Cohort (n=9,217)
Yes
Does long stenting (>40 mm) increase the risk of target lesion failure and stent thrombosis compared to short stenting (≤40 mm) in patients undergoing PCI with newer-generation DES?
Hazard Ratio: 1.88 (95% CI 1.67–2.13)
p-value: p=<0.001
Even in the contemporary era of second-generation drug-eluting stents, stenting longer than 40 mm remains associated with significantly higher risks of target lesion failure and stent thrombosis.
Longer stents (>40 mm) linked to higher adverse events post-PCI; leaves open whether length drives risk or marks complex lesions.
AIMS: We aimed to understand the association between stent length and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 9,217 patients who underwent stenting for a single lesion from the GRAND-DES registry, a patient-level pooled registry including five Korean multicentre DES registries. The median follow-up duration was 730 days (interquartile range 708 to 752 days). A total of 8,035 patients were classified into the short stenting group (≤40 mm), and 1,182 into the long stenting group (>40 mm). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF). Long stenting (>40 mm) was significantly associated with higher TLF (IPTW adjusted HR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.67-2.13; p<0.001), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (IPTW adjusted HR 2.20, 95% CI: 1.51-3.20; p<0.001). In the landmark analysis, the incidence of TLF was significantly higher with long stenting during the first 30 days after PCI (log-rank p=0.001) and also after 30 days (log-rank p<0.001). Long stenting was associated with a higher risk of early stent thrombosis (log-rank p=0.001), but not with that of late stent thrombosis (log-rank p=0.887). CONCLUSIONS: In the contemporary second-generation DES era, stenting longer than 40 mm continues to be associated with less favourable clinical outcomes such as TLF and stent thrombosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kong et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Percutaneous coronary intervention (n=9,217). Long stenting (>40 mm) vs. Short stenting (≤40 mm) was evaluated on target lesion failure (TLF) (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.67-2.13, p=<0.001). Long stenting (>40 mm) was significantly associated with a higher risk of target lesion failure compared to short stenting (HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.67-2.13; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: