Key result
Higher maximum wall shear stress and larger high-WSS area were independently associated with regression of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis over 1 year (observed in 46.2% of cases).
Why the study?
Understanding mechanisms underlying symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis progression or regression can inform secondary prevention, but the role of focal wall shear stress has seldom been investigated.
Is baseline focal wall shear stress associated with stenosis regression in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease?
Cohort (n=39)
Is baseline focal wall shear stress associated with stenosis regression in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease?
Higher focal wall shear stress is associated with regression of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis over 1 year under optimal medical treatment.
Higher focal WSS may mark sICAS regression; leaves open whether modulating WSS alters progression or events.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Understanding the mechanisms underlying progression/regression of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) will inform secondary prevention of the patients. Focal wall shear stress (WSS) may play an important role, which, however, had seldom been investigated. METHODS: Patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) attributed to 50% to 99% intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis were recruited. All patients underwent cerebral computed tomography angiography at baseline, and a computational fluid dynamics model was built based on computed tomography angiography to simulate blood flow and quantify WSS in the vicinity of the sICAS lesion. All patients received optimal medical treatment and a second computed tomography angiography at 1 year. The change in the luminal stenosis from baseline to 1 year in sICAS was defined as progression (increased >10%), quiescence (±10%), or regression (decreased >10%). Associations between baseline WSS metrics and sICAS regression were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 39 patients (median age 62 years; 27 males), sICAS luminal stenosis progressed, remained quiescent and regressed in 6 (15.4%), 15 (38.5%), and 18 (46.2%) cases, respectively. A higher maximum WSS and larger high-WSS area, throughout the sICAS lesion or obtained separately in the proximal and distal parts of the lesion, were independently associated with regression of luminal stenosis in sICAS over 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of sICAS lesions regress or stay quiescent in the luminal stenosis over 1 year after stroke under optimal medical treatment, when higher focal WSS may facilitate stenosis regression. Further studies of the effects of hemodynamics including WSS in altering plaque vulnerability and stroke risks are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lan et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) (n=39). Higher focal wall shear stress (WSS) was evaluated on Regression of luminal stenosis (decreased >10%) at 1 year. Higher maximum wall shear stress and larger high-WSS area were independently associated with regression of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis over 1 year (observed in 46.2% of cases).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: