Key result
High-frame-rate echoPIV reliably estimates LV flow versus 4D flow MRI with ~0.92 cosine similarity.
Why the study?
Accurately measuring intracardiac flow patterns may enhance diagnostic and prognostic capabilities, prompting validation of echoPIV against 4D flow MRI for in-vivo left ventricular flow imaging.
Does Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry (echoPIV) accurately measure left ventricular intracardiac flow patterns compared to 4D flow MRI in patients requiring cardiac MRI?
Cross-Sectional (n=26)
No
Does Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry (echoPIV) accurately measure left ventricular intracardiac flow patterns compared to 4D flow MRI in patients requiring cardiac MRI?
Effect estimate: Cosine similarity 0.92 ± 0.06
EchoPIV provides a reliable estimation of left ventricular flow with spatial-temporal velocity distributions comparable to 4D flow MRI, offering higher temporal resolution but greater dependence on image quality.
May enable accessible LV flow imaging; leaves open diagnostic/prognostic adoption pending larger studies.
Aims Accurately measuring intracardiac flow patterns could provide insights into cardiac disease pathophysiology, potentially enhancing diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. This study aims to validate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry (echoPIV) for in-vivo left ventricular intracardiac flow imaging against 4D flow MRI. Methods and Results We acquired HFR contrast-enhanced ultrasound images from three standard apical views of 26 patients who required cardiac MRI. 4D flow MRI was obtained for each patient. Only echo image planes with sufficient quality and alignment with MRI were included for validation. Regional velocity, kinetic energy and viscous energy loss were compared between modalities using normalized mean absolute error, cosine similarity and Bland-Altman analysis. Among 24 included apical view acquisitions, we observed good correspondence between echoPIV and MRI regarding spatial flow patterns and vortex traces. The velocity profile at base-level (mitral valve) cross-section had cosine similarity of 0.92 ± 0.06 and normalized mean absolute error of 14 ± 5%. Peak spatial mean velocity differed by 3 ± 6 cm/s in systole and 6 ± 10 cm/s in diastole. The kinetic energy and rate of energy loss also revealed a high level of cosine similarity (0.89 ± 0.09 and 0.91 ± 0.06) with normalized mean absolute error of 23 ± 7% and 52 ± 16%. Conclusions Given good B-mode image quality, echoPIV provides a reliable estimation of left ventricular flow, exhibiting spatial-temporal velocity distributions comparable to 4D flow MRI. Both modalities present respective strengths and limitations: echoPIV captured inter-beat variability and had higher temporal resolution, while MRI was more robust to patient BMI and anatomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiomyopathy screening (n=26). High Frame Rate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry (echoPIV) vs. 4D flow MRI was evaluated on Velocity profile agreement at the base level (mitral valve cross-section) (Cosine similarity 0.92 ± 0.06). High-frame-rate echoPIV provided reliable estimation of left ventricular flow compared to 4D flow MRI, achieving a cosine similarity of 0.92 for velocity profiles at the mitral valve level.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: