Key result
The hypertension ECHO training series for healthcare workers did not significantly improve patient-level hypertension treatment rates compared to standard support after adjusting for baseline differences and within-site variation.
Why the study?
Healthcare workers in Nigeria participated in an Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) hypertension training series, but the patient-level effects remained to be evaluated.
Does the ECHO hypertension training model for community healthcare workers improve hypertension treatment and control rates among primary care patients?
Observational (n=4,340)
Random selection of sites
Yes
Does the ECHO hypertension training model for community healthcare workers improve hypertension treatment and control rates among primary care patients?
Effect estimate: Adjusted Beta 0.11 (95% CI -0.13, 0.34)
Absolute Event Rate: 97.45% vs 93.34%
p-value: p=0.37
A virtual peer-to-peer hypertension training program for community health workers in Nigeria was associated with moderately increased hypertension treatment rates without adversely affecting clinic capacity.
ECHO training does not improve hypertension treatment rates; leaves open whether refined implementation strategies merit testing.
BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) including community health extension workers (CHEWs) in the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria participated in a hypertension training series following the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) model which leverages technology and a practical peer-to-peer learning framework to virtually train healthcare practitioners. We sought to evaluate the patient-level effects of the hypertension ECHO series. METHODS: HCWs from 12 of 33 eligible primary healthcare centers (PHCs) in the Hypertension Treatment in Nigeria Program (NCT04158154) were selected to participate in a seven-part hypertension ECHO series from August 2022 to April 2023. Concurrent Hypertension Treatment in Nigeria Program patient data were used to evaluate changes in hypertension treatment and control rates, and adherence to Nigeria's hypertension treatment protocol. Outcomes were compared between the 12 PHCs in the ECHO program and the 21 which were not. RESULTS: Between July 2022 and June 2023, 16,691 PHC visits were documented among 4340 individuals (ECHO: n = 1428 [33%], non-ECHO: n = 2912 [67%]). Patients were on average (SD) 51.5 (12.0) years old, and one-third were male (n = 1372, 32%) with no differences between cohorts in either characteristic (p ≥ 0.05 for both). Blood pressures at enrollment were higher in the ECHO cohort compared to the non-ECHO cohort (systolic p < 0.0001 and diastolic p = 0.0001), and patients were less likely to be treated with multiple medications (p < 0.0001). Treatment rates were similar at baseline (ECHO: 94.0% and Non-ECHO: 94.7%) and increased at a higher rate (interaction p = 0.045) in the ECHO cohort over time. After adjustment for baseline and within site variation, the difference was attenuated (interaction p = 0.37). Over time, control rates increased and medication protocol adherence decreased, with no differences between cohorts. Staffing levels, adult patient visits, and rates of hypertension screening and empanelment were similar between ECHO and non-ECHO cohorts (p ≥ 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: The ECHO series was associated with moderately increased hypertension treatment rates and did not adversely affect staffing or clinical capacity among PHCs in the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria. These results may be used to inform strategies to support scaling hypertension education among frontline HCWs throughout Nigeria, and use of the ECHO model for CHEWs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Hypertension Treatment in Nigeria Program was prospectively registered on November 8, 2019 at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT04158154; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04158154 ).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baldridge et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=4,340). Hypertension ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) training series vs. Non-ECHO primary healthcare centers was evaluated on Hypertension treatment rates over time (Adjusted Beta 0.11, 95% CI -0.13, 0.34, p=0.37). The hypertension ECHO training series for healthcare workers did not significantly improve patient-level hypertension treatment rates compared to standard support after adjusting for baseline differences and within-site variation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: