Key result
Quarterly supportive supervision is linked to improved feasibility and a ~63% increase in hypertension facility readiness.
Why the study?
Supportive supervision was added to improve the implementation of HEARTS, a multi-level hypertension diagnosis and management strategy bundle in public primary healthcare facilities.
Do quarterly supportive supervision visits improve implementation outcomes and facility readiness in a community hypertension program?
Observational
Yes
Do quarterly supportive supervision visits improve implementation outcomes and facility readiness in a community hypertension program?
Quarterly supportive supervision visits in a large community hypertension program in Nigeria successfully improved implementation outcomes and facility readiness for quality hypertension care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support supervision integration in similar LMIC programs; extends HEARTS data but leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: The Hypertension Treatment in Nigeria (HTN) Programme established a system for hypertension diagnosis and management in 60 public primary healthcare facilities in the Federal Capital Territory of Nigeria through the implementation of HEARTS, a multi-level strategy bundle including team-based care led by community health extension workers (CHEWs). To improve HEARTS implementation, supportive supervision was added as an implementation strategy in April 2020. METHODS: A multidisciplinary supportive supervision team and data collection forms were developed and implemented at HTN-supported sites. Data from April 2020 to December 2023 from supportive supervision visits were used to measure supportive supervision implementation outcomes, including reach, fidelity, adoption and feasibility and effectiveness of quality of care, data reporting and facility readiness. Descriptive analyses were performed to summarise outcomes. Jonckheere-Terpstra or Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to measure change over time for medians or proportions, respectively. RESULTS: The programme successfully designed and performed quarterly supportive supervision visits. There was high reach (100% sites with visits each year), fidelity (median 100% (IQR 89%-100%) of core components completed), adoption (100% teams provided quarterly visits) and increase in feasibility (planned visits completed) (90.8% to 97.8%, p=0.002). Effectiveness outcomes included an increase in patients with blood pressure (BP) checked in the last 3 days (78.4% to 84.4%, p=0.009), treatment cards without errors (71.5% to 85%. p<0.001), but a slight drop in CHEW fidelity to BP measurement technique (91.5% to 86.5%, p=0.02). Facility readiness increased in adequate staffing (56.7% to 98.3%, p<0.001), but decreased for equipment availability (98.3% to 90.0%, p=0.03). Overall, the proportion of facilities with all readiness components present increased from 0% to 63.3% (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We designed and implemented a supportive supervision strategy with strong implementation outcomes and most effectiveness outcomes including facility readiness to provide quality hypertension care in Nigeria. This approach can be modelled for supporting HEARTS implementation in other settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial was prospectively registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov under NCT04158154 on 8 November 2019; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04158154.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shedul et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Hypertension. Supportive supervision visits was evaluated on Supportive supervision implementation outcomes (reach, fidelity, adoption, feasibility) and effectiveness (quality of care, facility readiness). Quarterly supportive supervision visits in a Nigerian hypertension program improved implementation feasibility and facility readiness.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: