Key result
Brachial flow-mediated dilation measurement showed limited evidence of improving cardiovascular risk prediction beyond traditional risk factors, with only 1 of 3 studies reporting an improvement in AUC.
Why the study?
Does brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) measurement improve risk stratification for incident cardiovascular events on top of traditional risk factors in asymptomatic individuals?
Systematic Review
Does brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) measurement improve risk stratification for incident cardiovascular events on top of traditional risk factors in asymptomatic individuals?
Current evidence is too limited to support the routine use of brachial flow-mediated dilation on top of traditional risk factors for cardiovascular risk stratification in asymptomatic individuals.
Should not yet alter clinical risk stratification; leaves open FMD's incremental value in larger prospective cohorts.
Adequate risk assessment for cardiovascular disease (CVD) is essential as a guide to initiate drug treatment. Current methods based on traditional risk factors could be improved considerably. Although brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) predicts subsequent cardiovascular events, its predictive value on top of traditional risk factors is unknown. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the incremental predictive value of FMD on top of traditional risk factors in asymptomatic individuals. Using PubMed and reference tracking, three studies were identified that reported on the incremental value of FMD using change in the area under the curve (AUC). Two large cohort studies found no improvement in AUC when FMD was added to traditional risk prediction models, whereas one small case-control study found an improvement. One study used the net reclassification improvement (NRI) to assess whether FMD measurement leads to correct risk stratification in risk categories. Although this study did not find an improvement in AUC, the NRI was statistically significant. Based on the reclassification results of this study, FMD measurement might be helpful in risk prediction. Evidence supporting the use of FMD measurement in clinical practice for risk stratification for CVD on top of traditional risk factors is limited, and future studies are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peters et al. (2011) conducted a systematic review in Cardiovascular disease risk assessment. Brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) measurement vs. Traditional risk factors alone was evaluated on Incremental predictive value for incident cardiovascular events (change in AUC or NRI). Brachial flow-mediated dilation measurement showed limited evidence of improving cardiovascular risk prediction beyond traditional risk factors, with only 1 of 3 studies reporting an improvement in AUC.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: