Key result
A tablet-PC-based telenursing program did not significantly reduce urgent hospital admissions for heart failure compared to usual care (11% vs 18%, HR 0.82).
Why the study?
Does a tablet-PC-based nursing intervention program improve readmission rates, clinic visits, and quality of life in patients with heart failure and implantable cardiac devices?
RCT (n=33)
Open-label
Minimization method
No
Does a tablet-PC-based nursing intervention program improve readmission rates, clinic visits, and quality of life in patients with heart failure and implantable cardiac devices?
A tablet-PC-based nursing intervention program for heart failure patients with implantable devices did not significantly reduce readmissions or unexpected clinic visits, though qualitative data suggested signs of behavior modification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No readmission benefit in small RCT; hypothesis-generating for behavior change, warranting larger telenursing trials in device-monitored HF.
Background: With the rapid aging of society, the number of patients with heart failure has also increased. Implantable devices for heart failure have become standardized. Remote monitoring using cardiac devices has grown in popularity for medical efficiency and the early detection of abnormalities. Our first aim was to develop a tablet-PC-based nursing intervention program for patients requiring remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices. The second purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of the program by using mixed-methods research. Methods: The study consisted of two phases. In phase 1, we designed a tablet-PC-based nursing intervention program, on the basis of a literature review and qualitative data collected via semi-structured interviews. In phase 2, we conducted a randomized controlled trial that served as a preliminary investigation of the program. The outcome measures were readmission, unexpected visits to the clinic for heart problems, quality of life, self-care behavior, and self-efficacy. After the study, we interviewed each participant about his or her experiences with the program. Interviews were audio recorded, coded, and thematically analyzed. Results: The 33 patients with heart failure were randomized into two groups as follows: 17 patients in the telenursing group and 16 in the control group. During 6 months of follow-up, the readmission for heart failure occurred in 11% of the intervention group and 18% of the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at any outcome measures. Three themes were extracted via qualitative analysis: “getting a sense of safety,” “triggering a health behavior change,” and “feeling like a burden.” Conclusion: No improvements in rates of rehospitalization or unexpected clinic visits were seen in the quantitative study. However, signs of behavior modification were seen in the qualitative study. This program has the possibility of improving patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Umeda et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Heart Failure (n=33). Tablet-PC-based nursing intervention program vs. Usual care was evaluated on Urgent hospital admissions associated with the heart (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.42-12.42, p=0.3441). A tablet-PC-based telenursing program did not significantly reduce urgent hospital admissions for heart failure compared to usual care (11% vs 18%, HR 0.82).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: