Key result
Idiopathic tricuspid regurgitation was associated with significantly better right ventricular fractional area change compared to functional tricuspid regurgitation (p=0.002).
Why the study?
A new class termed idiopathic tricuspid regurgitation has been proposed, but definitions have varied among different studies.
Does strictly defined idiopathic tricuspid regurgitation have distinct right ventricular function characteristics compared to other types of TR in patients with moderate-to-severe TR?
Cohort (n=670)
No
Does strictly defined idiopathic tricuspid regurgitation have distinct right ventricular function characteristics compared to other types of TR in patients with moderate-to-severe TR?
Idiopathic TR is associated with better right ventricular function than other secondary TRs and should be classified as a distinct type of TR.
Strictly defined idiopathic TR may confer better RV outcomes than functional TR; leaves open whether reclassification should guide management.
BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is known to cause right ventricular (RV) failure and death. Although TR is traditionally classified as primary or secondary, recently, a new class of TR called idiopathic TR has been proposed, with varying definitions among different studies. METHODS: The data were retrospectively collected for the period of January to June 2018 for 8711 patients from the patient cohort of the National Cheng Kung University Hospital echocardiography laboratory. A total of 670 patients (7.7%) with moderate-to-severe TR were included. Idiopathic TR was diagnosed strictly using a new systematic approach. RESULTS: The distribution of significant TR included 74 (11.0%) primary TR cases, 48 (7.2%) with pacemaker-related TR, 267 (39.9%) with left heart disease, 24 (3.6%) with congenital heart disease, 6 (0.9%) with RV myopathy, 105 (15.7%) with pulmonary hypertension, and 146 (21.8%) with idiopathic TR. The mean age in primary and idiopathic TR groups was older ( p = 0.004), with lower estimated pulmonary pressure ( p < 0.001), higher RV fraction area change (FAC, p < 0.001), and tricuspid annulus systolic velocity (S', p = 0.004) compared with functional TR group. Multivariate analysis showed that idiopathic TR ( p = 0.002) and primary TR ( p = 0.008) had better RV FAC than functional TR. CONCLUSION: Idiopathic TR was associated with better RV function than the other secondary TRs. Thus, idiopathic TR should be strictly defined and regarded as a distinct type of TR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation (n=670). Idiopathic tricuspid regurgitation vs. Functional tricuspid regurgitation was evaluated on Right ventricular fraction area change (FAC) (p=0.002). Idiopathic tricuspid regurgitation was associated with significantly better right ventricular fractional area change compared to functional tricuspid regurgitation (p=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: