Key result
CPR-IR index correlates more strongly with glucose disposal rate than HOMA-IR in type 2 diabetes.
Cross-Sectional (n=41)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyzes insulin resistance index in type 2 diabetes, suggesting a reliable measure for assessment.
BACKGROUND: Increased hepatic insulin clearance (HIC) is important in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this study is to analyze an effective insulin resistance (IR) index that is minimally affected by HIC. METHODS: Our study involved 20 participants with T2DM and 21 healthy participants without diabetes (Non-DM). Participants underwent a meal tolerance test from which plasma glucose, insulin and serum C-peptide immunoreactivity (CPR) were measured, and HOMA-IR and HIC were calculated. Participants then underwent a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp from which the glucose disposal rate (GDR) was measured. RESULTS: The index CPR-IR = 20/(fasting CPR × fasting plasma glucose) was correlated more strongly with GDR, than was HOMA-IR, and CPR-IR could be used to estimate GDR. In T2DM participants with HIC below the median, HOMA-IR and CPR-IR were equally well correlated with GDR. In T2DM with high HIC, CPR-IR correlated with GDR while HOMA-IR did not. In Non-DM, CPR-IR and HOMA-IR were equally well correlated with GDR regardless of HIC. The mean HIC value in T2DM was significantly higher than that of Non-DM. CONCLUSIONS: CPR-IR could be a simple and effective index of insulin resistance for patients with type 2 diabetes that is minimally affected by HIC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okura et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=41). CPR-IR index vs. HOMA-IR was evaluated on Correlation with glucose disposal rate (GDR). The CPR-IR index correlated more strongly with glucose disposal rate than HOMA-IR, providing an effective measure of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes regardless of hepatic insulin clearance.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: