Key result
High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention without elective mechanical circulatory support was feasible and safe, achieving a 98.2% procedural success rate and a 1.6% 30-day mortality rate.
Why the study?
Broadening mechanical circulatory support recommendations for high-risk PCI remains controversial due to device-related complications and lack of robust randomized trial evidence.
Is high-risk PCI without elective mechanical circulatory support feasible and safe in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=1,680)
No
Is high-risk PCI without elective mechanical circulatory support feasible and safe in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
High-risk PCI without elective mechanical circulatory support is feasible and safe in the majority of patients, with a 98.2% procedural success rate and low 30-day mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports high-risk PCI without elective MCS in selected stable CAD; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm safety and generalizability.
Background: Recommendations to broaden the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain controversial with the absence of robust evidence from randomized clinical trials and the risk of device-related complications. This investigation examined whether performing high-risk PCI without elective MCS is feasible and safe. Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis for patients meeting contemporary high-risk PCI criteria as defined by the Interventional Council of the American College of Cardiology. These criteria include unprotected left main disease, last remaining conduit, left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, three-vessel coronary artery disease, severe aortic stenosis, or severe mitral regurgitation. Clinical, procedural, and major in-hospital and 30-day cardiovascular outcomes were assessed. Results: The analysis included a cohort of 1680 patients (2887 lesions) with stable coronary artery disease who met high-risk PCI criteria and were treated from 2003 to 2018. The study population comprised 75% men and 68% whites. Mean age was 69.16±11.19 years. Conventional cardiovascular risk factors among our cohort were as follows: hypertension, 91%; hypercholesterolemia, 91%; diabetes, 44%; and cigarette smoking, 14%. Intravascular ultrasound was performed on 53% of the lesions. Rescue MCS was required in 0.8% of the patients. Procedural success was observed in 98.2% of the patients, while the 30-day mortality rate was 1.6%. The incidence of major complications was as follows: all-cause mortality, 1.6%; cardiac death, 0.8%; acute renal failure, 4.6%; stroke, 0.2%; and major bleeding, 1.1%. Conclusions: High-risk PCI as defined by the professional societies without elective MCS is feasible and safe in the majority of patients, challenging the current recommendations and practice. A randomized trial comparing unprotected versus protected high-risk PCI for these broad recommendations is warranted to best ascertain which patients would benefit from MCS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalid et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Stable coronary artery disease (n=1,680). High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention without elective mechanical circulatory support was evaluated on Procedural success. High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention without elective mechanical circulatory support was feasible and safe, achieving a 98.2% procedural success rate and a 1.6% 30-day mortality rate.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: