Systematic review identifies key themes and gaps in responsible innovation within business contexts, suggesting future research.
Responsible Innovation (RI) has gained increasing attention over the past decade, primarily in the context of publicly funded scientific research. However, in business scholarship, RI remains an emerging and fragmented concept, lacking a consensus on its definition, scope, boundary conditions, and uneven evidence on how firms operationalize RI in practice. To address this oversight, we conduct a systematic review of 100 peer‐reviewed studies in the business discipline. We synthesize how RI is conceptualized, identify dominant theoretical lenses and mechanisms, and map what is known about RI‐related outcomes in corporate settings. Our analysis reveals that while RI is increasingly associated with firms' sustainability strategy and competitive advantages, significant gaps remain in measurement, operationalization, and the conditions under which RI creates value versus imposes costs. We advance a research agenda that highlights specific research directions to deepen the exploration of RI in business contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: