Key result
The role of digitalis in treating cardiovascular disease remains a subject of intense debate regarding its efficacy and safety.
Why the study?
Does digitalis improve outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Does digitalis improve outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease?
This editorial discusses the historical and ongoing controversy regarding the efficacy and safety of digitalis in cardiovascular disease.
The role of digitalis in treating cardiovascular disease has been at the center of the oldest continuing controversy in the history of medicine. Ever since its clinical introduction by William Withering more than 200 years ago,1 physicians have disagreed fiercely about the drug's efficacy and safety, with some advocating its widespread use and others recommending that its application be severely limited or abandoned entirely. Evidence from clinical studies published during the past decade has heightened the sophistication of the debate, but not diminished its intensity.Advocates of digitalis have argued that the drug should be used because it has been . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milton Packer (1997) conducted an editorial in cardiovascular disease. Digitalis was evaluated. The role of digitalis in treating cardiovascular disease remains a subject of intense debate regarding its efficacy and safety.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: