Key result
Non-invasive magnetocardiographic mapping correctly identified the left atrial breakthrough sites in 93% (27 of 29) of cases when compared to invasive electroanatomic mapping.
Why the study?
Does 99-channel magnetocardiography accurately identify inter-atrial conduction pathways compared to invasive electroanatomic mapping in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=27)
Does 99-channel magnetocardiography accurately identify inter-atrial conduction pathways compared to invasive electroanatomic mapping in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Magnetocardiographic mapping can accurately and non-invasively identify inter-atrial conduction pathways, which may assist in understanding atrial fibrillation pathogenesis and tailoring therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Noninvasive MCG mapping of interatrial conduction is feasible in paroxysmal AF; leaves open its role in ablation planning or recurrence prediction.
AIMS: Alteration in conduction from right to left atrium (LA) is linked to susceptibility to atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined whether different inter-atrial conduction pathways can be identified non-invasively by magnetocardiographic mapping (MCG). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 27 patients undergoing catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF, LA activation sequence was determined during sinus rhythm using invasive electroanatomic mapping. Before this, 99-channel magnetocardiography was recorded over anterior chest. The orientation of the magnetic fields during the early (40-70 ms from P onset) and later part (last 50%) of LA depolarization was determined using pseudocurrent conversion. Breakthrough of electrical activation to LA occurred through Bachmann bundle (BB) in 14, margin of fossa ovalis (FO) in 3, coronary sinus ostial region (CS) in 2, and their combinations in 10 cases by invasive reference in total of 29 different P-waves. Based on the combination of pseudocurrent angles over early and late parts of LA activation, the MCG maps were divided to three types. These types correctly identified the LA breakthrough sites to BB, CS, FO, or their combinations in 27 of 29 (93%) cases. CONCLUSION: Magnetocardiographic mapping seems capable of distinguishing inter-atrial conduction pathways. Recognizing the inter-atrial conduction pattern may assist in understanding the pathogenesis of AF and identifying the subgroups for patient-tailored therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jurkko et al. (2008) conducted an observational in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=27). Magnetocardiographic mapping (MCG) vs. Invasive electroanatomic mapping was evaluated on Correct identification of left atrial breakthrough sites. Non-invasive magnetocardiographic mapping correctly identified the left atrial breakthrough sites in 93% (27 of 29) of cases when compared to invasive electroanatomic mapping.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: