Why the study?
Does a superconducting quantum interference device magnetocardiography (MCG) system accurately localize atrial arrhythmia sources to guide minimal AF surgery in patients with chronic AF?
Does a superconducting quantum interference device magnetocardiography (MCG) system accurately localize atrial arrhythmia sources to guide minimal AF surgery in patients with chronic AF?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel 64-channel MCG system successfully localized atrial arrhythmia sources non-invasively, enabling map-guided minimal AF surgery that restored sinus rhythm in a preliminary case series.
Map-guided surgery is the goal for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), because it minimizes unnecessary incisions or procedures. We propose a totally-noninvasive and even non-contact method to detect atrial arrhythmia with a superconducting quantum interference device magnetocardiography (MCG) system, and report the first clinical application case of MCG map-guided AF surgery. To detect weak atrial excitation, we utilized a high sensitive 64-channel MCG system measuring tangential magnetic field components, which is known to be more sensitive to a deeper current source. We measured the MCG signals from eight patients with chronic AF. Then, we separated the f-wave from the other components by using independent component analysis. The extracted f-wave caused by reentrant myocardial excitation was three-dimensionally localized on the mesh model of a human heart by a novel beamformer technique having a surface action potential activity as its filter output. We localized the abnormal stimulation source of an atrial arrhythmia non-invasively and visualized the current source distribution corresponding to the atrial excitation successfully on the three-dimensional atrial surface, which was separated from the ventricular excitation. Using this atrial mapping, we underwent minimal AF surgery in three patients and converted their AF to sinus rhythm successfully.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ds et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: