Key result
In patients receiving ICDs or CRT-Ds for primary prevention, programming for antitachycardia pacing successfully terminated 92% of ventricular tachycardia episodes.
Why the study?
Does antitachycardia pacing (ATP) improve successful termination of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ICDs or CRT-Ds for primary prevention?
Population
830 patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators or cardiac resynchronization therapy…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
12 months
Authors
Loading...
ATP programming in primary prevention ICDs was associated with high VT termination rates; leaves open whether it reduces shocks or improves outcomes.
Observational (n=830)
Yes
Does antitachycardia pacing (ATP) improve successful termination of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ICDs or CRT-Ds for primary prevention?
Programming antitachycardia pacing in primary prevention ICD/CRT-D patients successfully terminates the vast majority of ventricular tachycardia episodes, potentially reducing the need for painful shocks.
Saeed et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (n=830). Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) programming was evaluated on Successful termination of ventricular tachycardia (VT) by ATP. In patients receiving ICDs or CRT-Ds for primary prevention, programming for antitachycardia pacing successfully terminated 92% of ventricular tachycardia episodes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: