Key result
Antitachycardia pacing and low-energy shock successfully terminated induced very fast ventricular tachycardia in 30% and 86% of episodes, respectively, in patients with ICDs.
Why the study?
Does antitachycardia pacing and low-energy shock effectively terminate induced very fast ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators?
Cohort (n=152)
Does antitachycardia pacing and low-energy shock effectively terminate induced very fast ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators?
Antitachycardia pacing and low-energy shocks are effective at terminating induced very fast ventricular tachycardia during electrophysiological studies, suggesting a potential alternative to high-energy shocks.
ATP and low-energy shocks merit evaluation for VFVT in ICDs; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the efficacy of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and low-energy (5J) shock for very fast ventricular tachycardia (VFVT), cycle length 200-250 ms, in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-two consecutive patients with standard indications for ICD therapy were enrolled. Before discharge from the hospital each patient had an electrophysiological study (EPS) performed through the device, to assess the efficacy of ATP and low-joule shock at terminating VFVT. Initial therapy for VFVT consisted of three bursts of ATP followed by low-energy shock, and high-energy shocks as required. The mean age of enrolled patients was 63 +/- 13 years, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 31 +/- 13%. During the predischarge EPS, a total of 125 VT episodes were induced in 64 patients. In patients with VFVT, the success rate of ATP was 30% (14/46), the acceleration rate was 26% (12/46), and the success rate of low-energy shock was 86% (25/29). In patients with fast ventricular tachycardia (FVT), cycle lengths 251-320 ms, the success rate of ATP was 62% (24/39), the acceleration rate was 18% (7/39), and the success rate of low-energy shock was 94% (17/18). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated for the first time that ATP and low-energy shock are effective, as an alternative to high-energy shock, to revert induced VFVT. Low-energy shock has a very high success rate for VT slower than VFVT. Clinical studies are required prior to consideration for empiric programming.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sivagangabalan et al. (2008) conducted a cohort in Patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) (n=152). Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and low-energy (5J) shock was evaluated on Success rate of ATP and low-energy shock at terminating induced very fast ventricular tachycardia (VFVT). Antitachycardia pacing and low-energy shock successfully terminated induced very fast ventricular tachycardia in 30% and 86% of episodes, respectively, in patients with ICDs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: