Key result
Coarctation pressure overload linked to ~3.5-point lower LV GLS vs VSD volume overload.
Why the study?
Studies have concentrated on myocardial remodeling under varying loading conditions in animal models, but human comparisons of myocardial responses between volume overload and pressure overload lesions were needed.
Do myocardial responses to pressure overload (CoA) differ from responses to volume overload (VSD) in infants with congenital heart disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=60)
No
Do myocardial responses to pressure overload (CoA) differ from responses to volume overload (VSD) in infants with congenital heart disease?
In infants with congenital heart disease, pressure overload (CoA) leads to early and greater impairment of myocardial tissue velocities and global longitudinal strain compared to volume overload (VSD).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pressure overload may impair LV function more than volume overload in infants with CHD; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background: Pressure and volume loads are vital components of every congenital heart disease. Numerous studies have concentrated on investigating myocardial remodeling under varying loading conditions in animal models. The objective of this study was to compare myocardial responses in lesions with volume overload, specifically ventricular septal defects (VSD), and lesions with pressure overload, such as coarctation. Methodology: = 21). The severity of VSD has been measured by its size. In contrast, the severity of discrete CoA was quantified by the pressure gradient across the coarcted segment. The parasternal long axis assessed septal hypertrophy and left ventricular (LV) dilatation-systolic myocardial LV velocities using tissue Doppler imaging. The global longitudinal strain was performed to assess LV function accurately. Results: The CoA groups displayed significant septal hypertrophy compared to the other two study groups: IVSd (CoA: 8 ± 1.6 vs. VSD 5.7 ± 0.9). LV dilatation was more marked in the VSD group: LV end-diastolic dimension (CoA: 30 ± 3 vs. 25 ± 1.7). Systolic septal and mitral annular velocities were reduced in the CoA group and intriguingly exaggerated in the VSD group: Septal basal systolic myocardial velocity: (VSD: 9 ± 2 vs. CoA: 5 ± 1 vs. Controls: 7 ± 0.8). Myocardial GLS was markedly reduced in the CoA group. Conclusions: Besides the well-known eccentric-concentric hypertrophy paradigm in volume-pressure loading of the myocardium, pressure load seems to reduce myocardial velocities and LV function to a greater extent than volume loading. This is putatively mediated via myosin class switching, reduced myofilament sensitivity to calcium, and disrupted mechanical-electrical synchrony.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AbdelMassih et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Congenital Heart Disease (Ventricular Septal Defect or Coarctation of the Aorta) (n=60). Coarctation of the Aorta (pressure overload) vs. Ventricular Septal Defect (volume overload) and Healthy Controls was evaluated on Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) (p=<0.001). Pressure overload from aortic coarctation significantly reduced left ventricular global longitudinal strain and systolic myocardial velocities compared to volume overload from ventricular septal defects.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: