Key result
Peak concentrations of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban were significantly higher than trough concentrations, while dose adjustments according to guidelines did not significantly change concentrations.
Why the study?
Although DOACs do not require routine monitoring, drug level assessment may be necessary to manage side effects or confirm efficacy, prompting this evaluation of DOAC concentration trends in a real-life population.
Observational (n=236)
No
p-value: p=<0.0001
In a real-world cohort, DOAC peak concentrations were significantly higher than trough concentrations, supporting the guideline that routine monitoring is not necessary for the general population but may be useful in specific clinical settings.
DOAC level testing may aid select scenarios; leaves open standardized thresholds and outcome impact.
Introduction: For years, anticoagulants have been the basic group of drugs that slow down, inhibit or prevent blood clotting by inhibiting thrombin formation or reducing its activity. Treatment with DOACs does not require routine anticoagulation monitoring due to their wide therapeutic index. However, there are circumstances where it may be necessary to know the drug levels to manage the risk of side effects or to confirm laboratory efficacy. In such a situation, an indication for DOAC laboratory testing could be the suspicion of excessively high or low DOAC levels. The aim of this article was to determine trends in concentrations of DOACs in a real life population of patients. Material and methods: Consultations in clinical pharmacology extended with DOAC level assessments were performer in the Department of Cardiology and Clinical Pharmacology. The trial was designed as a retrospective analysis of laboratory analyses and included 480 laboratory tests performed in 236 patients. Results: Mean CHA 2 DS 2- VASc scoring 3.91 ±1.92 and HAS-BLED scoring 3.57 ±1.75 indicated high risks of both thrombosis and bleeding. Geometric mean of trough concentrations for dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban were 91.53 ng/mL, 62.74 ng/mL and 124.81 ng/mL, whereas peak concentrations for all DOACs were significantly higher, at 220.80 ng/mL ( p < 0.0001), 116.59 ng/mL ( p < 0.0001) and 186.18 ng/mL ( p =0.0354), respectively. Values for males and females did not differ significantly. Dose adjustment, performed according to rules described for every drug in registered drug characteristics, did not change significantly concentrations. Trough concentrations higher than 20 ng/mL were found at the 10 th percentile for all DOACs, but higher at 40 ng/mL at the 5 th percentile was found only for apixaban. Peak concentration lower than 400 ng/mL were for the 95 th percentile for apixaban and for the 90 th percentile for dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Conclusion: Monitoring-based pharmacotherapy with DOACs should be restricted only to specific clinical settings; in the general population, it is not necessary. Recently, in many experienced centers, therapeutic drug monitoring of DOACs has gained great importance in selected clinical settings and it very likely will soon become commonplace in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grzegorz Grześk (2021) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation and other indications for DOAC therapy (n=236). Direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) was evaluated on DOAC peak vs trough concentrations (p=<0.0001). Peak concentrations of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban were significantly higher than trough concentrations, while dose adjustments according to guidelines did not significantly change concentrations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: