Key result
DOAC plasma monitoring fails to alter patient management in ~51% of cases.
Why the study?
The use of direct oral anticoagulants is increasing and specific plasma concentrations have been shown to be reliable for optimizing patient care, but real-life data on indications and consequences of monitoring these levels are limited.
Observational (n=1,488)
No
DOAC level monitoring should not yet change practice; leaves open its utility and requires prospective trials.
Introduction The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is increasing. Specific concentrations are available and have been proven to be reliable and reproducible in optimising patient care. This retrospective, monocentric study aimed to describe the indications and consequences of monitoring DOAC plasma levels on patient care. Materials and methods We collected data of patients hospitalised at the Bordeaux University Hospital between January 2017 and December 2018. These included demographics, indications, type, dose of DOAC, standard coagulation tests, creatinine clearance and DOAC plasma concentration using specifically calibrated rivaroxaban and apixaban anti-Xa and dabigatran anti-IIa assays. The date of last DOAC intake, the time between intake and plasma level measurement were also collected and analysed. Results A total of 2197 DOAC assays in 1488 patients were obtained in various clinical situations: urgent or elective procedures, context of acute renal failure, suspicion or occurrence of ischemic strokes, intra-cranial and other bleeding sites. Interpretation of these assays led physicians to maintain, postpone or cancel invasive and high haemorrhagic risk procedures in 757, 261 and 56 cases respectively. The remaining 1123 assays were associated with no significant modification of patient care. DOAC plasma concentration was ≤30 ng ml -1 (sensitivity 85.4%, specificity 73.6%, positive predictive value 71.1%, negative predictive value 86.7%, AUC 0.81) after a last intake of at least 2 days. Conclusions Our study is, to date, the largest report of real-life measurement of specific DOAC plasma level at a single institution. Patient care was not modified in more than half of the assays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cavaillez et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) (n=1,488). Monitoring DOAC plasma concentrations was evaluated on Consequences of monitoring DOAC plasma levels on patient care. Monitoring DOAC plasma concentrations resulted in no significant modification of patient care in 1,123 of 2,197 assays (51.1%), though it guided procedure management in the remaining cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: