Key result
CMR septal scar and septal flash strongly predict CRT response with an AUC of ~0.86.
Why the study?
Response to CRT depends on septal viability and correction of abnormal septal motion, leading researchers to investigate whether CMR can identify CRT responders by combining assessment of septal flash and septal scar.
Does the combined assessment of septal scar and septal flash using cardiac magnetic resonance identify responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Observational (n=136)
Yes
Does the combined assessment of septal scar and septal flash using cardiac magnetic resonance identify responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy?
The combined assessment of septal scar and septal flash by CMR accurately identifies CRT responders, outperforming conventional QRS duration and morphology criteria.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid CRT selection via CMR septal assessment; leaves open randomized validation before practice change.
Background: The response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) depends on septal viability and correction of abnormal septal motion. This study investigates if cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as a single modality can identify CRT responders with combined imaging of pathological septal motion (septal flash) and septal scar. Methods: In a prospective, multicenter, observational study of 136 CRT recipients, septal scar was assessed using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (n = 127) and septal flash visually from cine CMR sequences. The primary endpoint was CRT response, defined as ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume with echocardiography after 6 months. The secondary endpoint was heart transplantation or death of any cause assessed after 39 ± 13 months. Results: Septal scar and septal flash were independent predictors of CRT response in multivariable analysis (both p < 0.001), while QRS duration and morphology were not. The combined approach of septal scar and septal flash predicted CRT response with an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78–0.94) and was a strong predictor of long-term survival without heart transplantation (hazard ratio 0.27, 95% CI: 0.10–0.79). The accuracy of the approach was similar in the subgroup with intermediate (130–150 ms) QRS duration. The combined approach was superior to septal scar and septal flash alone (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The combined assessment of septal scar and septal flash using CMR as a single-image modality identifies CRT responders with high accuracy and predicts long-term survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larsen et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Dyssynchronous heart failure (n=136). Combined assessment of septal scar and septal flash using cardiac magnetic resonance vs. Septal scar or septal flash alone was evaluated on CRT response, defined as ≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume with echocardiography after 6 months (AUC 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.94, p=<0.01). The combined assessment of septal scar and septal flash using cardiac magnetic resonance significantly predicted cardiac resynchronization therapy response with an area under the curve of 0.86.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: