Key result
Local pulse wave velocity measured via a dual-element photoplethysmograph probe correlated significantly with diastolic blood pressure (r=0.82) and enabled cuffless estimation (RMSE 5.26 mmHg).
Why the study?
Can local pulse wave velocity measured by a dual-element photoplethysmograph probe accurately estimate arterial blood pressure compared to reference brachial measurements?
Observational (n=90)
Can local pulse wave velocity measured by a dual-element photoplethysmograph probe accurately estimate arterial blood pressure compared to reference brachial measurements?
Effect estimate: r = 0.82
A novel dual-element photoplethysmograph probe measuring local carotid pulse wave velocity shows promise for noninvasive, cuffless monitoring of diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure.
Prototype enables repeatable carotid PWV measurement in young adults; leaves open clinical validation and utility.
An arterial compliance, dual-element photoplethysmograph probe for local pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement was developed. Initially, the experimental validation study was performed on 25 young volunteers (age =24.5 ± 4 years). Local PWV was assessed from a small section (23 mm) of the carotid artery. The prototype device demonstrated its capability of measuring reliable, repeatable, and reproducible carotid local PWV. Further, in 15 healthy male volunteers (age = 22.25 ± 3.5 years), carotid local PWV and brachial blood pressure (BP) were continuously recorded during their postexercise recovery period. Local PWV followed the changes in arterial BP parameters. The group average correlation coefficients (r) of local PWV versus BP parameters were between 0.772 ± 0.033 and 0.934 ± 0.028. In a population of 50 patients (normotensive and hypertensive) aged 24-80 years, local PWV-BP correlations were investigated. Local PWV tended to follow the diastolic BP (DBP; r = 0.82) and mean arterial pressure (r = 0.83) better than systolic BP (SBP; r = 0.69). It was significantly inferior in tracking pulse pressure values (r = 0.35). Cuffless estimation of arterial pressure was also performed on the same patients using measured carotid local PWV with best-case calibrations. Local PWV yielded good DBP prediction than SBP prediction. Statistically, significant correlation (r = 0.79) and a root-mean-square error of 5.26 mmHg versus reference brachial DBP were achieved. The introduced technique has a potential for short- or long-term noninvasive, cuffless monitoring of BP parameters from superficial arteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nabeel et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers and normotensive/hypertensive patients (n=90). Local pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement using dual-element photoplethysmograph probe vs. Reference brachial blood pressure was evaluated on Correlation between local PWV and reference brachial diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (r = 0.82). Local pulse wave velocity measured via a dual-element photoplethysmograph probe correlated significantly with diastolic blood pressure (r=0.82) and enabled cuffless estimation (RMSE 5.26 mmHg).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: