Key result
Hypertensive patients had a significantly higher local pulse wave velocity of the left common carotid artery compared to healthy subjects (6.29 m/s vs 5.31 m/s, p=0.019) when measured by the noninvasive dual pulse wave Doppler method.
Why the study?
Does the dual pulse wave Doppler (DPWD) method accurately and reproducibly measure local arterial pulse wave velocity in vitro and in vivo?
Cross-Sectional (n=90)
No
Does the dual pulse wave Doppler (DPWD) method accurately and reproducibly measure local arterial pulse wave velocity in vitro and in vivo?
Absolute Event Rate: 6.29% vs 5.31%
p-value: p=0.019
The dual pulse wave Doppler method provides a feasible, noninvasive, and reproducible approach to measuring local arterial pulse wave velocity, successfully distinguishing hypertensive patients from healthy subjects.
Supports DPWD for detecting carotid stiffness differences in hypertension; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity and reproducibility of a noninvasive dual pulse wave Doppler (DPWD) method, which involves simultaneous recording of flow velocity of two independent sample volumes with a measurable distance, for measuring the local arterial pulse wave velocity (PWV) through in vitro and in vivo studies. METHODS: The DPWD mode of Hitachi HI Vision Preirus ultrasound system with a 5-13MHz transducer was used. An in vitro model was designed to compare the PWV of a homogeneous rubber tubing with the local PWV of its middle part measured by DPWD method. In the in vivo study, local PWV of 45 hypertensive patients (25 male, 49.8±3.1 years) and 45 matched healthy subjects (25 male, 49.3±3.0 years) were investigated at the left common carotid artery (LCCA) by DPWD method. RESULTS: In the in vitro study, the local PWV measured by DPWP method and the PWV of the homogeneous rubber tubing did not show statistical difference (5.16 ± 0.28 m/s vs 5.03 ± 0.15 m/s, p = 0.075). The coefficient of variation (CV) of the intra- and inter- measurements for local PWV were 3.46% and 4.96%, for the PWV of the homogeneous rubber tubing were 0.99% and 1.98%. In the in vivo study, a significantly higher local PWV of LCCA was found in the hypertensive patients as compared to that in healthy subjects (6.29±1.04 m/s vs. 5.31±0.72 m/s, P = 0.019). The CV of the intra- and inter- measurements in hypertensive patients were 2.22% and 3.94%, in healthy subjects were 2.07% and 4.14%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the feasibility of the noninvasive DPWD method to determine the local PWV, which was accurate and reproducible not only in vitro but also in vivo studies. This noninvasive echocardiographic method may be illuminating to clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=90). Hypertension vs. Healthy subjects was evaluated on Local pulse wave velocity (PWV) of the left common carotid artery (p=0.019). Hypertensive patients had a significantly higher local pulse wave velocity of the left common carotid artery compared to healthy subjects (6.29 m/s vs 5.31 m/s, p=0.019) when measured by the noninvasive dual pulse wave Doppler method.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: