Key result
Injection of a bio-inert PEG hydrogel significantly increased infarct wall thickness (p=0.006) but was insufficient to prevent negative left ventricular remodeling or decline in ejection fraction post-myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
Does injection of a bio-inert, non-degradable synthetic polymer (PEG gel) prevent negative left ventricular remodeling post-myocardial infarction in a rat model?
Does injection of a bio-inert, non-degradable synthetic polymer (PEG gel) prevent negative left ventricular remodeling post-myocardial infarction in a rat model?
p-value: p=0.006
Passive structural reinforcement of the LV wall with a bio-inert polymer increases infarct wall thickness but is insufficient to prevent post-MI negative remodeling and cardiac dysfunction.
Bio-inert PEG hydrogel fails to prevent post-MI remodeling or EF decline despite thicker walls; challenges mechanical support strategies alone in preclinical models.
BACKGROUND: Several injectable materials have been shown to preserve or improve cardiac function as well as prevent or slow left ventricular (LV) remodeling post-myocardial infarction (MI). However, it is unclear as to whether it is the structural support or the bioactivity of these polymers that lead to beneficial effects. Herein, we examine how passive structural enhancement of the LV wall by an increase in wall thickness affects cardiac function post-MI using a bio-inert, non-degradable synthetic polymer in an effort to better understand the mechanisms by which injectable materials affect LV remodeling. METHODS AND RESULTS: Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) gels of storage modulus G' = 0.5±0.1 kPa were injected and polymerized in situ one week after total occlusion of the left coronary artery in female Sprague Dawley rats. The animals were imaged using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 7±1 day(s) post-MI as a baseline and again post-injection 49±4 days after MI. Infarct wall thickness was statistically increased in PEG gel injected vs. control animals (p<0.01). However, animals in the polymer and control groups showed decreases in cardiac function in terms of end diastolic volume, end systolic volume and ejection fraction compared to baseline (p<0.01). The cellular response to injection was also similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that passive structural reinforcement alone was insufficient to prevent post-MI remodeling, suggesting that bioactivity and/or cell infiltration due to degradation of injectable materials are likely playing a key role in the preservation of cardiac function, thus providing a deeper understanding of the influencing properties of biomaterials necessary to prevent post-MI negative remodeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rane et al. (2011) studied Myocardial Infarction (n=16). Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogel vs. Saline was evaluated on Infarct wall thickness and cardiac function (ejection fraction, end diastolic volume, end systolic volume) (p=0.006). Injection of a bio-inert PEG hydrogel significantly increased infarct wall thickness (p=0.006) but was insufficient to prevent negative left ventricular remodeling or decline in ejection fraction post-myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: