Key result
Visually evoked cerebral blood flow response remained significantly impaired in former smokers compared to nonsmokers (p<0.002), with no significant difference from current smokers (p=0.0556).
Why the study?
Does smoking cessation improve visually evoked cerebral blood flow response in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=45)
Does smoking cessation improve visually evoked cerebral blood flow response in healthy volunteers?
p-value: p=<0.01
Smoking cessation for 6-18 months does not reverse the impairment of visually evoked cerebrovascular response, suggesting that smoking causes long-term structural changes to vessels rather than just acute effects.
Persistent cerebrovascular impairment post-cessation warrants caution in assuming reversibility; leaves open recovery timelines beyond 18 months.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In our previous study, impaired visually evoked flow velocity response was demonstrated in young chronic smokers. Our aim was to study whether impaired cerebrovascular reactivity is reversible 6-18 months after smoking cessation. METHODS: Flow velocity changes, evoked by visual stimulus, were recorded in the posterior cerebral arteries in 15 smokers, 15 former smokers and 15 nonsmokers. The stimulation protocol consisted of 10 cycles with a resting phase of 20 s (baseline) and a stimulating phase of 40 s for each cycle. Relative changes of flow velocity were expressed in relation to baseline. Breath holding index, visual evoked potential and intima-media thickness were also examined. RESULTS: Repeated measures ANOVA revealed marked difference in the flow velocity time courses between the 3 groups (p < 0.01). The flow response was significantly worse in former smokers than in nonsmokers (p < 0.002), however, no significant difference was found between former and current smokers (p = 0.0556). CONCLUSION: This is the first transcranial Doppler study demonstrating long-term impairment of visually evoked cerebrovascular response after smoking cessation. These findings indicate that the impairment of neurovascular coupling caused by smoking is due to structural changes of the vessels, rather than acute effect of smoking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boms et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=45). Smoking cessation (former smokers) vs. Nonsmokers and current smokers was evaluated on Visually evoked cerebral blood flow velocity response (p=<0.01). Visually evoked cerebral blood flow response remained significantly impaired in former smokers compared to nonsmokers (p<0.002), with no significant difference from current smokers (p=0.0556).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: