Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 14, 2005European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Factors influencing the survival of cryopreserved homografts. The second homograft performs as well as the first☆

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Independent risk factors for cryopreserved homograft explantation included non-anatomical position (P=0.001), smaller graft size (P<0.0001), younger age (P<0.0001), and clamp time (P=0.01).

Why the study?

What are the factors influencing the survival and freedom from explantation of cryopreserved homografts implanted in the right ventricular outflow tract?

Population

272 patients undergoing pulmonary valve reconstruction with 301 homografts. Indications included tetralogy…

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

median 5.7 years (range 0-14)

Authors

BMBart MeynsInterventional / Structural CardiologyRJRamadan JashariCliniques Universitaires Saint-LucMGMarc GewilligPediatric Cardiology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Patient age, homograft size, and position influence durability; leaves open optimal selection criteria for prospective validation.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=272)

Structured PICO

What are the factors influencing the survival and freedom from explantation of cryopreserved homografts implanted in the right ventricular outflow tract?

P
Population
272 patients (median age 13 years) undergoing pulmonary valve reconstruction with 301 cryopreserved homografts in the right ventricular outflow tract, followed for a median of 5.7 years.
E
Exposure
Cryopreserved homografts implanted in the right ventricular outflow tract
O
Outcome
Graft replacement (explantation) and actuarial survivalhard clinical

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.0001

The life span of cryopreserved homografts in the right ventricular outflow tract is primarily determined by graft size and non-anatomic position, with second homografts performing as well as the first.

Cite This Study

Meyns et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Pulmonary valve reconstruction (n=272). Risk factors (non-anatomical position, smaller graft size, younger age) was evaluated on Graft explantation (p=<0.0001). Independent risk factors for cryopreserved homograft explantation included non-anatomical position (P=0.001), smaller graft size (P<0.0001), younger age (P<0.0001), and clamp time (P=0.01).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a63d688f3f956990ff2dea7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.03.041

Topics

Congenital heart disease adults
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Guidelines for Reporting Morbidity and Mortality after Cardiac Valvular Operations1996 · 29 citations
  2. 2Does Histocompatibility Affect Homograft Valve Function After the Ross Procedure?2001 · 44 citations
  3. 3Does Histocompatibility Affect Homograft Valve Function After the Ross Procedure?2001 · 36 citations
  4. 4Reconstruction of the RVOT with valved biological conduits: 25 years experience with allografts and xenografts✩2000 · 201 citations
  5. 5Bovine valved venous xenografts for RVOT reconstruction: results after 71 implantations12002 · 118 citations