Key result
Switching from conventional tobacco cigarettes to heat-not-burn cigarettes for 1 month significantly improved global longitudinal strain by a mean difference of 2.35%.
Why the study?
Does switching to heat-not-burn cigarettes improve myocardial, coronary, and vascular function compared to conventional tobacco cigarettes in smokers?
RCT (n=75)
Single-blind
Randomized
No
Does switching to heat-not-burn cigarettes improve myocardial, coronary, and vascular function compared to conventional tobacco cigarettes in smokers?
Mean Difference: 2.35 (95% CI 0.23–4.48)
Absolute Event Rate: -20.9% vs -20%
p-value: p=0.03
Switching from conventional tobacco to heat-not-burn cigarettes for one month appears to partially improve surrogate markers of vascular and myocardial function, suggesting a less detrimental acute and short-term cardiovascular profile.
HNBC may reduce acute vascular strain versus Tcig; leaves open whether switching improves hard CV outcomes in larger trials.
We compared the effects of Heat-not-Burn cigarette (HNBC) to those of tobacco cigarette (Tcig), on myocardial, coronary and arterial function as well as on oxidative stress and platelet activation in 75 smokers. In the acute study, 50 smokers were randomised into smoking a single Tcig or a HNBC and after 60 min were crossed-over to the alternate smoking. For chronic phase, 50 smokers were switched to HNBC and were compared with an external group of 25 Tcig smokers before and after 1 month. Exhaled carbon monoxide (CO), pulse wave velocity (PWV), malondialdehyde (MDA) and thromboxane B2 (TxB2) were assessed in the acute and chronic study. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), myocardial work index (GWI), wasted myocardial work (GWW), coronary flow reserve (CFR), total arterial compliance (TAC) and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) were assessed in the chronic study. Acute HNBC smoking caused a smaller increase of PWV than Tcig (change 1.1 vs 0.54 m/s, p < 0.05) without change in CO and biomarkers in contrast to Tcig. Compared to Tcig, switching to HNBC for 1-month improved CO, FMD, CFR, TAC, GLS, GWW, MDA, TxB2 (differences 10.42 ppm, 4.3%, 0.98, 1.8 mL/mmHg, 2.35%, 19.72 mmHg%, 0.38 nmol/L and 45 pg/mL respectively, p < 0.05). HNBCs exert a less detrimental effect on vascular and cardiac function than tobacco cigarettes.Trial registration Registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT03452124, 02/03/2018).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikonomidis et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Healthy smokers (n=75). Heat-not-burn cigarette (HNBC) vs. Tobacco cigarette (Tcig) was evaluated on Global longitudinal strain (GLS) at 1 month (MD 2.35%, 95% CI 0.23-4.48, p=0.03). Switching from conventional tobacco cigarettes to heat-not-burn cigarettes for 1 month significantly improved global longitudinal strain by a mean difference of 2.35%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: