Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 1, 1994Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

In a computational model, muscle fiber curvature caused spiral wave drift and altered planar wavefront propagation, increasing maximal upstroke rate by 74% with a 15 degree/cm gradient.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Population

Two-dimensional anisotropic cardiac propagation modeled using a finite element method

Comparison

Muscle fiber curvature vs Uniform fiber orientation

Design

Preclinical

Key result

In a computational model, muscle fiber curvature caused spiral wave drift and altered planar wavefront propagation, increasing maximal upstroke rate by 74% with a 15 degree/cm gradient.

Authors

JRJack M. RogersAMAndrew D. McCulloch

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Computational models of fiber curvature may guide arrhythmia simulations; leaves open relevance to clinical reentry mechanisms.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Two-dimensional anisotropic cardiac propagation modeled using a finite element method (modification of the FitzHugh-Nagumo equations)
E
Exposure
Muscle fiber curvature (nonuniform fiber orientation)
C
Comparator
Uniform fiber orientation
O
Outcome
Spiral wave drift and planar wavefront propagation parameterssurrogate

Computational modeling demonstrates that muscle fiber curvature causes spiral wave drift and alters planar wave propagation, potentially impacting the stability of reentrant arrhythmias.

Cite This Study

Rogers et al. (1994) studied Reentrant tachyarrhythmias. Muscle fiber curvature vs. Uniform fiber orientation was evaluated on Spiral wave drift and propagation parameters. In a computational model, muscle fiber curvature caused spiral wave drift and altered planar wavefront propagation, increasing maximal upstroke rate by 74% with a 15 degree/cm gradient.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a64c4226bff88a468b2df3fhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1994.tb01290.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share