Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To compare the results of two methods of treatment for bucket-handle tears of the medial meniscus eighty-seven knees were studied, thirty-seven treated by excision of the bucket-handle tear alone and fifty by total meniscectomy. A postoperative history suggestive of locking was given by one patient in each treatment group. Anteroposterior laxity was found in 72% of knees treated by excision of the bucket-handle tear alone as compared with 68% of the knees treated by total meniscectomy, but in all other respects the results showed a marginal preference in favor of the simpler operation. Although the numbers are too small to prove that results are better following excision of the bucket-handle tear alone, it is suggested, in the absence of evidence that total meniscectomy is more advantageous, that the simpler operation of excision of just the bucket-handle tear is the treatment of choice in bucket-handle tears of the medial meniscus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cargill et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: